Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pick # 40 has to be....

Devin

By Devin,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Devin Newbie

Devin

Posted
Posted

Tonight we draft the 40th pick.

 

To me,  it's between Cam Robinson and Derek Rivers.  Both are of substantial need, and both present great value with the pick.   My money is on Cam Robinson if he's available.

 

Considering the first round has come and gone... 

 

Who ya got at 40? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Devin Newbie

Devin

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, 15 said:

I've got Zay Jones or Chris Godwin. They're gonna bring in one more play maker and get this offense back to #1. 

I wouldn't mind Godwin at all.  

 

Hes got something special about him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

I'm all over the place...

Hard to tell what pick or round we should go after a guy because one team's #40 best player might be another team's #33.  Just like last year, not many teams had Bradberry projected where we took him, but we valued him that highly.

That being said, my guys to pick from for day 2, in no particular order are:

Budda Baker

Obi

Chris Godwin

Zay Jones

Teez Tabor

*I know we need another pass rusher, but I went back through the list of all the DE/OLBs we met with and the only ones left are all tweeners (~250 lbs.), outside of Tanoh from Villanova.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Devin Newbie

Devin

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I'm all over the place...

Hard to tell what pick or round we should go after a guy because one team's #40 best player might be another team's #33.  Just like last year, not many teams had Bradberry projected where we took him, but we valued him that highly.

That being said, my guys to pick from for day 2, in no particular order are:

Budda Baker

Obi

Chris Godwin

Zay Jones

Teez Tabor

*I know we need another pass rusher, but I went back through the list of all the DE/OLBs we met with and the only ones left are all tweeners (~250 lbs.), outside of Tanoh from Villanova.

I forgot about Obi like a lot of people for got about Dre....

 

if Obi and Robinson are there...  damn that's a tough choice.  I think the panthers are in love with the guy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Devin Newbie

Devin

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I'm all over the place...

Hard to tell what pick or round we should go after a guy because one team's #40 best player might be another team's #33.  Just like last year, not many teams had Bradberry projected where we took him, but we valued him that highly.

That being said, my guys to pick from for day 2, in no particular order are:

Budda Baker

Obi

Chris Godwin

Zay Jones

Teez Tabor

*I know we need another pass rusher, but I went back through the list of all the DE/OLBs we met with and the only ones left are all tweeners (~250 lbs.), outside of Tanoh from Villanova.

If you could ONLY pick one though... hm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Devin Newbie

Devin

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Onion Knight said:

I feel sad for people who are getting all worked up over second round pick desires. There's a very high probability that you're going to have your heart broken.

It's just a casual conversation hombre.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PrimeTimeHeel Newbie

PrimeTimeHeel

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Devin said:

Tonight we draft the 40th pick.

 

To me,  it's between Cam Robinson and Derek Rivers.  Both are of substantial need, and both present great value with the pick.   My money is on Cam Robinson if he's available.

 

Considering the first round has come and gone... 

 

Who ya got at 40? 

 

We need a pass blocking LT. Robinson is a run blocking RT or OG. 

Rivers has zero pass rushing moves. 

Just no. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

BPA.  Hard to argue against most positions at this point.  A ton of DB talent still sitting there though.

That being the case, my logic would be to pick an equally talented player at another position of need where there isn't currently a "ton of talent", then pick the DB with the next 2nd or with the 3rd round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...