Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Knowing how all the pieces fell ~ Draft Redo


PrimeTimeHeel

Recommended Posts

Based on how things played out and with hindsight being 20/20 lets have fun with this...

1(8): O.J. Howard (TE)

2(40): Dalvin Cook (HB)

2(64): Curtis Samuel (WR) (only team to take a WR was Pitt @ 62.. and they took JuJu)

3(77):  Deashon Hall (DE) (Keeping trade in place as i don't see a player i would take between 77 and 98)

5(152): Will Holden (RT)

6(192): Jeremy Clark (CB) ( at 6'3 220 and solid tackler i would convert him to Safety)

7(233): Ben Boulware (LB) (debated Elijah Hood here.. but can't deny the intangebles of Boulware)

That's MY perfect draft based on how things fell.. getting Howard and Cook + a similar player in Samuel made the loss of CMac Manageable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TalonNC said:

Based on how things played out and with hindsight being 20/20 lets have fun with this...

1(8): O.J. Howard (TE)

2(40): Dalvin Cook (HB)

2(64): Curtis Samuel (WR) (only team to take a WR was Pitt @ 62.. and they took JuJu)

3(77):  Deashon Hall (DE) (Keeping trade in place as i don't see a player i would take between 77 and 98)

5(152): Will Holden (RT)

6(192): Jeremy Clark (CB) ( at 6'3 220 and solid tackler i would convert him to Safety)

7(233): Ben Boulware (LB) (debated Elijah Hood here.. but can't deny the intangebles of Boulware)

That's MY perfect draft based on how things fell.. getting Howard and Cook + a similar player in Samuel made the loss of CMac Manageable. 

Based on how things fell such as signing Boulware as a UDFA......  Let's take him in round 7!!!    

 

This poo is glitchy and forcing me to have a line underneath me words

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Based on how things fell such as signing Boulware as a UDFA......  Let's take him in round 7!!!    

 

This poo is glitchy and forcing me to have a line underneath me words

Yeah i thought about that after hitting submit... so I'm editing my post to take Hood. in the 7th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Based on how things fell such as signing Boulware as a UDFA......  Let's take him in round 7!!!    

 

This poo is glitchy and forcing me to have a line underneath me words

"Let's pay for something we got for free!"

Also, anybody who would take Howard over McCaffrey is excused from adult conversation. Because Howard was totally drafted 9th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

"Let's pay for something we got for free!"

Also, anybody who would take Howard over McCaffrey is excused from adult conversation. Because Howard was totally drafted 9th.

Always nice to critize without showing Your Redo....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TalonNC said:

Based on how things played out and with hindsight being 20/20 lets have fun with this...

1(8): O.J. Howard (TE)

2(40): Dalvin Cook (HB)

2(64): Curtis Samuel (WR) (only team to take a WR was Pitt @ 62.. and they took JuJu)

3(77):  Deashon Hall (DE) (Keeping trade in place as i don't see a player i would take between 77 and 98)

5(152): Will Holden (RT)

6(192): Jeremy Clark (CB) ( at 6'3 220 and solid tackler i would convert him to Safety)

7(233): Ben Boulware (LB) (debated Elijah Hood here.. but can't deny the intangebles of Boulware)

That's MY perfect draft based on how things fell.. getting Howard and Cook + a similar player in Samuel made the loss of CMac Manageable. 

Hmm I really like this one too except I would keep Armah in the 6th and Boulware already became ours as UDFA so the kicker could stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TalonNC said:

Always nice to critize without showing Your Redo....

Why would I, or anyone?

"I would take my first 2 picks WAYYY higher than anyone else!!"

If you wanna do that, just jump in the Wayback Machine and draft folks earllier than everybody.

Next 2 picks..."I'm good with them. They get back on my page".

We wanted Fournette or McCaffrey. Not Howard. Not Barnett. Not <insert random guy that I like, because I know more than everybody else>. We got a Round One guy, we went to Round Two. Move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The same folks crying about the OL right now were crying about it in 2023 too. We have tied up over 100 million dollars in two interior olinemen alone and we have Taylor Moton inked to a recent extension. We've invested multiple first and second round picks in the offense. We hired an offensive minded head coach. This is an offensive team. The offense needs to produce or people need to be replaced.
    • This is the same place that has ridiculed and blasted Caleb Williams at every opportunity he has his team sitting at 10-4 in the same NFC that the Panthers are competing in. And their division in the NFC North is as or more competitive as our division. Yet from the same people who have very high standards for Williams we get every excuse imaginable for the smallest starting QB in the league even when he and his team continue to disappoint when the pressure is on. You lot aren't any less inconsistent than anyone else.
    • The Panthers are 9th in cap spent on offense this year.  However next season is already a different story  The Panthers as it stands right now will be 18th in cap spent on offense and 8th in cap spent on defense  The Panthers are currently set to spend more on defense next year than they are on offense this season Guys like Jaycee and Moehrig cap numbers take a big jump. Wharton has a massive cap hit   Jaycee Moehrig and Wharton in 2025 The same 3 in 2026 So this same defense as it stands right now will cost more in 2026 than this offense does right now… Got anything else you want to try?
×
×
  • Create New...