Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Anyone Concerned About Cowher.....


fitty76

Recommended Posts

anyone worrying over a coach we don't have should find new hobbies.

Certainly, anyone thinking that buying a former Super Bowl winning coach guarantees anything should seriously reconsider that.

And for the record, Seifert inherited an offense. Nothing more. It was his defense. Then won a 2nd championship. And never went 8-8 there. By some of your expectations, he was a better choice than Cowher is now. No one knows what Cowher would actually do here, so it's hard to suggest that it matters three games into a season he's not coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, big difference. Bill Cowher built his team that won the super bowl. Siefert won with Walshs team that was loaded with super bowl talent when he took over.

16 years. It took 16 years for Cowher to win a Super Bowl.

I think that the people hoping for Cowher to come here are expecting instant wins when/if he does, and that is just stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have said it before. If your only reason for not wanting Cowher is because it took him 15 years to win the SB. It took Tom Landry 12 years to win one. If Jerry Jones hadn't paid off O'Donnell to throw two wide open interceptions, Cowher would have won one in his 6th season. Just admit you don't like Cowher and that is the reason you don't want him here. Personally I don't care, I would rather have a new coach over a retread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 years. It took 16 years for Cowher to win a Super Bowl.

I think that the people hoping for Cowher to come here are expecting instant wins when/if he does, and that is just stupid.

How many has John Fox won? You think he'll win one in less than 14 years? You people act like super bowl winning coaches grow on trees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the bright side, we have a DE that we gave up a #1 draft pick for that seems to me to be far better suited as a stand-up LB in the 3-4.

To be quite honest, I'm more worried about Fox. Hopefully, he'll figure out a way to win a few games so that we don't help build the 49ers house for the next several years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cowher won't become Seifert 2 because he won't coach here. Still, if you like the idea, here are the stats of the two coaches before Carolina.

Seifert: 98-30 (.766) with two superbowl wins in 8 seasons in SF. Overall playoff record: 10-5 (made playoffs 7 times in 8 seasons)

Cowher: 149-90-1 (.623) with one superbowl win in 15 seasons in Pittsburgh. Overall playoff record: 12-9 (made playoffs 10 times in 15 seasons)

You may now proceed to make excuses for Cowher, I know some of you are dieing to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is one of my key concerns lost in the sauce that is the neverending conversation about him evading pressure and the OL. Eventually any QB is going to have to step up into the pocket and show the defense they can still beat them even if they get through. We have a limited QB who cannot consistently do this and as such we are relegated to going back and forth about how successful he was at evading pressure but we have little else to write home about. Tyler Shough stepped up into the pocket and made plays despite being pressured and sacked. He's played in about 35 less games than Bryce Young. That is a problem. And isn't just going to go away. The Bucs are going to do the same thing after watching the film.
    • Oh, absolutely! That doesn't absolve the absolute dogshit hockey that the team played in front of him, though. Only Cane that played well tonight was Bradly Nadeau.
    • Thanks for illustrating my point.  No one in the last several pages of this discussion is suggesting we should hang on to him, but anytime someone says anything less than "take him out back and shoot him" you act like they are. That's either you not understanding what you're reading or just being a nimrod because you can't keep up. (I would have said 'or just sh-tposting' but you're way too emotional on this topic for that) Either way, the result is the same 😆
×
×
  • Create New...