Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thinking about moving to Alaska...


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

And there are (quite literally) 10 men for every woman. It's so bad, my 60-year old aunt in Alaska is dating a 35-year-old dude. It's a great place for women to move to, but if you're looking for any kind of action with someone not named Jackie Palmer, you're heading towards dire straits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anchorage is the best if you ask me. Big city small town feel but you have plenty of stuff to keep you entertained.

You dont lose your women just your turn. Anchorage is a good midsize city think the population is around 280,000. Fishing is great up there and plenty to do if you like the outdoors. Starting in early june IIRC salmon start running and you have until midaugust until they IIRC but you have king salmon run first then red salmon then the Silver Salmon run. Its a great way to spend your time and enjoy the scenerio just be warned you wont be alone when fishing. I have been elbow to elbow at times fishing which is a pain. But if you can go where others dont its great.

In the winter it can get depressing unless you keep active. Get a snow machine and go riding its great fun and again the scenery cant be beat. Also you can icefish in the winter, ski or snowboard, crosscountry skiing, or if you get into the right bunch of people dogsledding. Or do like me in the winter and go out to the bars. They have some good ones up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...