Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why was that not deemed a successful onside recovery by Funchess?


CatTower

Recommended Posts

ARTICLE 7. PLAYER POSSESSION

Item 1. Player in Possession. A player is in possession when he is inbounds and has a firm grip and control of the ball with his hands or arms.

 

Elbow down: Check

Both hands on ball: Check

No part of body touching out of bounds: Check

Right after this he hits out of bounds.  That's when the play ends, the toss doesn't matter.  It is a possession recovery by Devin Funchess.

Ns2WDA4.jpg

 

Image courtesy of @Aseagroves21 on twitter

He had the ball in his hands before falling out of bounds.  He was clearly in possession since he was able to toss it to Jacobs.  And, the fact that it was even close should side with the call on the field.  NFL is so scripted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, luke262 said:

He didn't have possession of the ball, he pushed the ball back in (or tried to) but I would imagine that it doesn't count as possessing the ball itself

No, he didn't.  He had both his hands on the ball securely and then flipped it up to Jacobs.  He clearly had possession before hitting the out of bounds line.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheTruth1887 said:

Starting early with the excuses lol 

hey. what excuses do you have for jumping the panthers and crawling back over to the saints lmao.

reminder when the saints were 0-2 this kid had himself a panthers logo and was a sudden panthers fan.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CatTower said:

He had the ball in his hands before falling out of bounds.  He was clearly in possession since he was able to toss it to Jacobs.  And, the fact that it was even close should side with the call on the field.  NFL is so scripted.

You're an idiot, learn the rules. He never establishes possession in bonds, furthermore, the toss to Jacobs was after he landed out of bounds. 

fug you're a retarded fug. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CatTower said:

No, he didn't.  He had both his hands on the ball securely and then flipped it up to Jacobs.  He clearly had possession before hitting the out of bounds line.  

I'll watch it again, if that is the case that is serious bs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WEEK 1: BEARS (W) WEEK 2: @ FALCONS (W) WEEK 3: @ BROWNS (L) WEEK 4: LIONS (L) WEEK 5: BYE WEEK 6: @ EAGLES (W) WEEK 7: BUCCANEERS (W) WEEK 8: @ PACKERS (L) WEEK 9: BRONCOS (L) WEEK 10: @ SAINTS (L) WEEK 11: RAVENS (W) WEEK 12: @ BUCCANEERS (L) WEEK 13: @ VIKINGS (W) WEEK 14: SAINTS (W) WEEK 15: BENGALS (W) WEEK 16: @ STEELERS (L) WEEK 17: SEAHAWKS (L) WEEK 18: FALCONS (W) FINAL RECORD: 9-8
    • The way I see it, we've got Chuba another year and Brooks spelling him/hopefully not getting injured.  Maybe Brooks surprises if healthy.  He was a very highly viewed RB for a reason.   After seeing the limited Etienne snaps, he's clearly a rotational back on the lower percentage rate. I.E. how TB uses Sean Tucker. So, unless something happens, Hubbard is getting bulk carriers, Brooks to spell/ease in, Etienne very situational.   If Hubbard goes down, then we're relying on Brooks/Etienne, but at that point, you grab a guy off our PS or street at that point as RB3.  Not a huge deal IMO.  It's RB.        
    • 17-0, plus taking all post-season games (disclaimer: let's see how this changes through training camp/pre-season/that bears game)
×
×
  • Create New...