Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Observations from John Fox Monday Transcript


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2009/10/panthers-coach-john-foxs-monday-transcript.html

Q. Talk about running the ball up the middle on four straight plays near the goal line and coming up empty.

"We don't want sideways runs. We want to get across the goal line. I don't think that's abnormal. Good teams run and are successful. We expected to get it."

Q. How's the offense line playing?

"1-3. Like I've coached, like the offense, the defense and kicking teams have been."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q. How's the offense line playing?

"1-3. Like I've coached, like the offense, the defense and kicking teams have been."

This is the best answer I've ever seen him give, actually, which isn't saying a lot but hey.

If running up the middle didn't work the first 3 times, what the f*ck makes him think that it will on the 4th try?

Because it eventually works sometimes. If you get 1 foot each time and you are 4 foot from the goal-line, guess what you get on the 4th down run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you know how different an answer it would be if you replaced "offensive line" with "Delhomme"?

Better? you put an average QB behind this OLine, and you see what we get. You put Brady behind this OLine and you still get a bad result. We've seen these examples everywhere this season, even on different teams, and even past year examples. Brady fuged up a lot when pressured.

OLine... is a correct statement. Delhomme, is not. Granted he f**ked the Moose interception and almost had another to Smith in the endzone. I'm not taking that away or saying Delhomme is a great QB.

But you won't find any better results with a better QB behind this line. There is no pocket, no protection, and no push for a run game. You would need Superman behind the line in that case.

When he gets protection, he's done a decent job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good thing about replacing a bad player is you really have nothing to lose. If their replacement is bad so what, you didn't get much worse and probably saved money.  
    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
    • lol...I don't remember that.  Although recalling what I had for breakfast yesterday is sometimes a challenge.  Hope it was a positive thing.
×
×
  • Create New...