Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers, Saints, and Falcons By Far Had The Toughest NFL Schedule and Most Meaningful Wins


Saca312

Recommended Posts

by golly the last scenario any nfc south fan should want but every nfl fan dreams of is having all three nfc south teams in the playoffs.

all three have faced the toughest sos in the nfl and had the more meaningful wins against legit opponents more-so than any other team in the nfl. 

so keep yall head up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

by golly the last scenario any nfc south fan should want but every nfl fan dreams of is having all three nfc south teams in the playoffs.

all three have faced the toughest sos in the nfl and had the more meaningful wins against legit opponents more-so than any other team in the nfl. 

so keep yall head up. 

where are the Pats? They played our division but the rest of the schedule is a complete f(cking joke aside from the Steelers coming up soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

where are the Pats? They played our division but the rest of the schedule is a complete f(cking joke aside from the Steelers coming up soon.

I don't know how they left the Patriots off. Patriots have had the 8th toughest schedule in the league, 4th toughest of all the teams with winning records. They should be right after us. Here's the full order -- Bolded teams with winning records:

1    Saints
2    Falcons
3    Panthers

4    Dolphins
5    Buccaneers
6    Packers
7    Bears
8    Patriots
9    Vikings
10    Rams

11    Redskins
12    Texans
13    Jets
14    Lions
15    Bills
16    Browns
17    Seahawks
18    Forty-Niners
19    Steelers
20    Chiefs
21    Raiders
22    Cowboys
23    Cardinals
24    Giants
25    Colts
26    Ravens
27    Broncos
28    Titans
29    Jaguars

30    Bengals
31    Eagles
32    Chargers

This source has the Falcons and Saints switch spots:
http://playoffstatus.com/nfl/afcsosag.html
http://playoffstatus.com/nfl/nfcsosag.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...