Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers Upper Level Tix Available


PantherBoy95

Recommended Posts

I won't do all of the back and forth like the other guy.
I went to SeatGeek, compared it to the market price and marked mine down $40 in the same area.
I am not selling them below face value. For one of the biggest games, with one of the best players of one of the most historic franchises coming into town.

If someone would like to give me a fair price that's LOWER THAN but comparable to market I am willing to do that.
I couldn't make either this or the Vikings game so I prefer they go to a Panthers fan.

If you can't afford tickets, either save up or simply skim past. I'm not sure what trust issues you all have but everyone isn't trying to "rip you off"
Be blessed.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PantherBoy95 said:

I won't do all of the back and forth like the other guy.
I went to SeatGeek, compared it to the market price and marked mine down $40 in the same area.
I am not selling them below face value. For one of the biggest games, with one of the best players of one of the most historic franchises coming into town.

If someone would like to give me a fair price that's LOWER THAN but comparable to market I am willing to do that.
I prefer they go to a Panthers fan.

If you can't afford tickets, either save up or simply skim past.
Be blessed.
 

I don't think it is a matter of being able to afford the tickets. That's pretty offensive you would say that to the huddle. We wouldn't inquire or question your pricing if we couldn't afford it, because we wouldn't have interest in the purchase.

However, since this is not a case of being able to afford it... this is a case of exactly what you did. Instead of providing a face value price to fellow fans (+/-10%), you have elected to go to the online marketplace, compare your price and figure out what you could sell them for to make profit. 

Instead of using the huddle for a place of sharing and community, you have elected to try and make money off of those who are willing to pay the price because they are fans. I don't see this as a favor or a hope of getting a fan in the stands, but just an easier sell.... maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well with all of that being said I have had someone willing to buy them.

I will emphasize that I did not intend to over-sell them, I can honestly say I believe that I was being more than fair.
  Yes profit would be made, but definitely not anywhere near comparable to what I saw them going for online. AKA $40-50 each less.

I understand the underlying sentiment however.

Best to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
    • Sorta related.  I just looked up a stat:  Success rates for NFL draft's second rounders.  I was surprised that it is 49%.  The success rate for first rounders is 58%.   Here success does not mean those that did not bust, it means that roughly half of the players selected in the second round become full-time starters at some point in their careers.  Busts do that too.  However, considering the fact that a first round talent is worth up to 1800 points (first overall pick) more than the first pick of the second round and as low as 350 points (last pick in first round) higher than the last pick in round 2, it seems there could be cases in which it would be to your advantage to trade out of round 1 and draft two or three second rounders for the value.  Of course, the elite players are likely to be gone, and some positions overwhelmingly suck after round 1 (traditionally, like QB or LT, for example), but if you need to find starters at positions like DT, G, LB, S, C, TE, RB, etc, there could be a time when you trade back for more starters.  I was surprised that the margin between rounds 1 and 2 was only 9%.    While I realize that some of you sofa scholars are thinking, "Well duh?  Trading back gives you more players." as you wipe the Cheetos off your shirt.  Not the point.  The point is you have to consider the draft,the needs (and the number of them), and you need to scout the second and third rounds like you do the first, the cap, and the long-term impact.  If you can find 2 players with a 49% chance of becoming a starter, are you better off than drafting one player who has a 58% chance in the long term? So if I traded away my first rounder for two second rounders (a trade most teams would make) regularly, when I got 10 second rounders (by trading 5 first rounders), 5 would be starters.  If I did not trade and kept my 5 first rounders, 3 would be starters.  Furthermore, their rookie contracts would be much cheaper than the 5 first rounders. 
×
×
  • Create New...