Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Would Have Been A Great Offensive Unit For Us This Year.


TheCableGuy

Recommended Posts

WR1: Ted Ginn

WR2: Devin Funchess

WR 3: Curtis Samuel

WR: 4 Damiere Byrd

WR 5: Philly Brown

 

TE 1: Greg Olsen

TE 2: OJ Howard

 

Nothing aginst Christian but giving Cam another big TE Like Howard would been great for this offense and with us having Ginn,Samuel,Byrd,and Brown we have plenty of speed already.

Also Ginn already proved in 2015 he can be a #1 WR in this offense and yes he drops some passes but defenses still got to respect his speed and his deep threat and you saw in 2015 that worked. It was a mistake not resigning him.

 

Also Trading Benjamin was the right move and thats why I don't have him listed here and I would have traded him before the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCableGuy said:

WR1: Ted Ginn

WR2: Devin Funchess

WR 3: Curtis Samuel

WR: 4 Damiere Byrd

WR 5: Philly Brown

 

TE 1: Greg Olsen

TE 2: OJ Howard

 

Nothing aginst Christian but giving Cam another big TE Like Howard would been great for this offense and with us having Ginn,Samuel,Byrd,and Brown we have plenty of speed already.

Also Ginn already proved in 2015 he can be a #1 WR in this offense and yes he drops some passes but defenses still got to respect his speed and his deep threat and you saw in 2015 that worked. It was a mistake not resigning him.

 

Also Trading Benjamin was the right move and thats why I don't have him listed here and I would have traded him before the draft.

Maybe Tampa will trade oj for Christian Would u do it? Tampa could use a guy like cmc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PantherNation123 said:

Ed Dickson is currently > or = OJ Howard...  long term obviously OJ will be better.  CMC is crucial to our offense, especially given the injuries to our WR's.  Poo OP's post

I'm not saying CMC is not important to us now I was just saying if we made the right moves in the off season and keep guys like Ginn and Brown to go with Curtis and Byrd we would have plenty of speed to strech the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao OJ Howard is still trash. Literally makes Ed Dickson look like an All-Pro.

He’s a bust and an overhyped TE who’ll turn out to be worse than Engram and Njoku long-term for sure. Still can’t make contested catches nor garner much separation nor run complex routes, just like he was at Bama.

 Pick 19 was way too high for him, pick 8 would’ve been hilariously bad.

CMC has been far better for us than OJ ever would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Yea let's not draft the only weapon Cam has. What a stupid stupid post

Fine you disagree about Cmc fine but I also would had kept Ginn which was our best WR and best deep threat we had and also  Curtis could do the samething CMC does they basially the same player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I don't know about Howard. But there's no doubt whatsoever that we should have retained Ginn. The homers here will die before they admit our previous GM made the same mistake not once but twice in just 3 years.

Oh my god dude how many times can you post the same thing over and over in a billion different threads before you get tired of saying it? Everyone on this damn board knows your opinion. Seriously take a breather for a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRumGone said:

Oh my god dude how many times can you post the same thing over and over in a billion different threads before you get tired of saying it? Everyone on this damn board knows your opinion. Seriously take a breather for a bit.

its the truth through cutting Ginn was a mistake and Ole Dave did it twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Lmao OJ Howard is still trash. Literally makes Ed Dickson look like an All-Pro.

He’s a bust and an overhyped TE who’ll turn out to be worse than Engram and Njoku long-term for sure. Still can’t make contested catches nor garner much separation nor run complex routes, just like he was at Bama.

 

Yup, shouldve gone George Kittle late instead like ive wanted.

Done pretty much the same stat wise in the receiving game (despite Kittle playing 1 less game) and He's a much better blocker than Howard which wouldve been great having Kittle back blocking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...