Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thought this would be entertaining


NeedSumD

Recommended Posts

Actually you did nothing but reinforce the fact that stats arent everything. Look whoelse is on that list, Marino,  mcnabb, warren moon. HOF Qbs with the same completion percentage as Cam. Somebody must of missed the memo on those guys huh? Good job buddy, you gave us some facts alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Dan Marino isn't even 1% higher than Cam and literally every 30 for 30 you see where they interview a QB that QB says Dan is the best pure passer ever.

Facts indeed.

Yeah 62,000 yards and 25,000 yards yeah You got me there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Actually you did nothing but reinforce the fact that stats arent everything. Look whoelse is on that list, Marino,  mcnabb, warren moon. HOF Qbs with the same completion percentage as Cam. Somebody must of missed the memo on those guys huh? Good job buddy, you gave us some facts alright.

I wonder what all the guys you just mentioned have in common :thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam plays in a system where he'll never be a high percentage passer, and no QB in this system would. Tons of modern QBs now are throwing 65% plus easily in these WC style systems. Completion percentage is a really stupid stat to look at when judging QB play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NeedSumD said:

Yeah 62,000 yards and 25,000 yards yeah You got me there.   

LOL...percentage isnt the same as accumulated yards. You only rack up yards with more time in the league. Cam is just 28 in 7 seasons not a retired 15 plus year vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Cam plays in a system where he'll never be a high percentage passer, and no QB in this system would. Tons of modern QBs now are throwing 65% plus easily in these WC style systems. Completion percentage is a really stupid stat to look at when judging QB play.

His completion percentage could easily be 5 points higher if he would just simply hit the wide open check down like the one he repeatedly ignores every game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NeedSumD said:

Yeah 62,000 yards and 25,000 yards yeah You got me there.   

Look at this retarded piece of poo compare 17 years of yards to 7 and not even total yards(missing TDs for a reason too) after derping the first comparison. You're a Paramecium brained Neanderthal with a fat tub of lard for a mom.

PAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...