I remember when some ppl here wanted Donavan Mitchell..

[WOW!!]

Yep that would have worked out way better..

[Eazy-E]

He would have never seen the floor.

[JakeDel5674]

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Yep that would have worked out way better..

No it wouldn't, Clifford would have him sitting on the bench like he does Monk. Because he doesn't play "defense." 

[Eazy-E]

Mitchell is also 2 years older than Monk.

[WOW!!]

Mitchell actually plays defense thoe..

[JakeDel5674]

5 hours ago, Professor Chaos said:

I remember reports of MJ loving Mitchell and this place being split on him. Then Monk "fell" to us and was the "no brainer" pick. We'd most likely have Mitchell right now if Monk didn't fall.

Same with Booker, we should’ve picked Booker instead of shitty Frank. But, it is what it is. Regardless, we don’t know how Monk will do because he never plays. Is Mitchell better right now? Yes, because he plays and Monk doesn’t. Monk could average 20 a game with PT, but Silas and Cliff refuse to play him. 

[bLACKpANTHER]

I was all in on Donavan Mitchell - he was a question mark because of his injury.. but when Monk fell to us it was a NO-Brainer.. he was an elite shooter that filled the biggest hole on our roster = shooter/scorer to take the load off of Kemba..

now, we haven't been using him as much because of the re-emergence of Lamb.. but I still think there is room to give him around 10 mins a night..

[WOW!!]

On 1/16/2018 at 8:44 AM, bLACKpANTHER said:

I was all in on Donavan Mitchell - he was a question mark because of his injury.. but when Monk fell to us it was a NO-Brainer.. he was an elite shooter that filled the biggest hole on our roster = shooter/scorer to take the load off of Kemba..

now, we haven't been using him as much because of the re-emergence of Lamb.. but I still think there is room to give him around 10 mins a night..

Monk could be use if Clifford had balls and put that bitch Batum on the bench.. But no.. He is a sorry ass coach who is a cancer for this team..