Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Very Hurney Mock Draft


ncfan

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, ncfan said:

2 months ago id say not a chance in hell we'd have a shot at Ridley.

There is a Strong possiblity 5 QBs go before our pick.  And that has pushed many mocks and  analysts to push him in our range.   

* See CBS's current mock

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/news/2018-nfl-mock-draft-bears-take-a-surprise-lb-at-no-8-four-qbs-go-in-top-five/

DJ Moore's stock is climbing as fast as anyones in this draft and most analysts have him as a top 15 guy now.  Sutton has always been said as a target scouts are drooling on and will go mid 1st (as you can see back in @Verge thread)  with those 2 going ahead of Ridley and highly doubtful 3 WRs go before our pick.  He falls in our lap

Reid.  At seasons end was looked at by everyone as a Mid 2nd.  His Huge combine is what pushed him up into borderline 1st range.  And as a team in desperate need of a Safety was a popular choice among many mocks to us.  Derwin James is a no brainer for a higher 1st, but Ronnie Harrison was a 1st round lock ahead of the combine.  He came into the combine with a bad sore hamstring, and caused him to not run the 40 and limited in drills.  This caused his stock to drop for the moment.  I still expect him to go ahead of Reid.  Pushing Reid just outside the 1st.  Most mocks have Reid going at #48 if he's not mocked to us in the 1st

The only wr I can see going before Ridley is Sutton tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...