Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Avengers Infinity War!


CarolinaCoolin

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

also i think MCU owes almost all of its success to Robert Downey Jr as Tony Stark.  outside of him it's difficult to like any of the other characters except spidey

i haven't seen black panther yet though or thor ragnarok

Agree on Downey Jr, but he's an amazing actor to begin with, and the role fit him perfectly. But, I do have to say I did enjoy Ruffalo's Hulk/Banner. At least through the two Avengers movies. But yeah, the rest are kind of "ehh... if you were replaced, I don't believe anyone would notice much."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

also i think MCU owes almost all of its success to Robert Downey Jr as Tony Stark.  outside of him it's difficult to like any of the other characters except spidey

i haven't seen black panther yet though or thor ragnarok

I don't know, I think Cap has a big part as well.   I really like Chris Evans' portrayal of Cap in the movies, he's actually much better than the comic version in my opinion.     I do agree Downey helped it explode (the MCU) but Evans has been a big part.    I'd say those two are the biggest for sure.   

If you liked Guardians 1/2 you'll like Ragnarok, because IMO it's the same type of feel as those movies, believe it or not.    It's really just good fun.  I liked it a lot.    Black Panther is great, probably not AS great as it's made out to be but it's stop a top MCU movie.   

Those people hating on BvS, Justice League, and Suicide Squad, well, yeah they weren't the best.    I think the ultimate edition or whatever of BvS make it a much better movie actually, give that a go.     It's not as bad as people say (granted the CGI on all the DC movies lately is TERRIBLE, they need a new studio).   Suicide Squad was just bad.     Justice League was fun, but still TERRIBLE CGI and the villain was just the worst.    It's sad because I actually feel Affleck is a great Batman, I was always a fan of the old, tough Batman.    Superman actor is great as well, Aquaman is good and Cyborg was a nice surprise.     Flash, was ok, but I wish they used TV flash, that kind of annoys me.      Wonderwoman is good because the acting was good and the writing was good but CGI still terrible.     They need to hire better people to work on their IPs.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm looking forward to ragnarok.  suicide squad was just horrible, and a letdown in every way.  if they'd gone the Logan path with it, it could have been amazing

DC could have been the one way ahead of the curve years ago, but they dropped the ball big time.  i didn't hate JL, it just felt rushed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantastic movie.    Some high stakes, though I think eventually they may not be as high stakes as they first appear but we'll see.    Just a great movie.   At times it suffers from bloat but that's to be expected since almost all the characters get ample time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...