Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 97 yard kickoff return for a touchdown


Recommended Posts

More than two guys is the definition of a wedge, and they had three, simple as that. I've seen it called a lot this season and the penalties that I've seen looked similiar to that one. It doesn't matter though because we won and the coverage wouldn't have stopped it anyway. It's like when holding gets called on the other side of the field, it had nothing to do with the outcome of the play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I've spent 30 mins trying to find some information about the wedge rule and the best thing I found was on PFT which is sad.

Everything that I have read has said that a wedge is when a group of players line up horizontaly and lock arms, moving forward to block during a kick return.

In contrast, explanations of the rule say nothing about the arms being locked or unlocked. Only that a group of players of three or more have to be at least 2 yards apart; but only two of the three.

I think this is one of those cases where the NFL is trying to put on a front that they are trying to make the game safer when in reality nothing was really changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They never locked arms. You had 3 players move side by side close to one another for about half a second and then spread apart going out to make their blocks. It wasn't a wedge in the traditional sense. Technically it could still be viewed as a penalty but it's not something you can really count on being called 100% of the time.

Bottom line is our coverage needs to be better. It's been pretty horrible all year (minus the Washington game), you can't really blame that on the refs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...