Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ vs Sammy Watkins - Combine / Field Translation Talk


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Next up we have another comparison of measurable raw ability vs another 1st round selection:

DJ Moore - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/d.j.-moore?id=32462018-0002-5602-31ed-ce270f370fe4

Sammy Watkins - http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/sammy-watkins?id=2543457

Considering a few failed to see the point that I wasn't saying DJ Moore would be OBJ, but that I was simply stating given his raw ability he has a chance to reach that level, I thought I'd bring an even closer comparison in Sammy, a receiver many of you wanted us to break the bank for this off-season. 

In nearly every measure Moore, is equal to, or slightly better than Watkins, and if you compare some of the early win routes that Moore is projected to be best at ''early'' slants, digs, post, curls, and then you take a brief look at :

You will begin to see a clear picture, a  lot of what Watkins was successful with just last season was the same ''early win'' routes Moore is expected to run as a rookie, (slant, dig, post, curl) the vertical attempts and plays will be there. You keep seeing posters here say ''we need a receiver that turns 50/50 balls into 70/30'' and that's not what they're trying to do as an offense. That was the KB mindset, the mindset is get the ball out, and get it out quick and let the receivers do the work. 

You save that 50/50 stuff for the redzone, it's not a realistic way to expect to move the ball. Even if you go and look up some of OBJ's best plays many of them are of the same variety, I'm not saying Moore is the next Steve Smith, or OBJ, or Sammy Watkins, but what he seems to be coming in, is a receiver who can emerge as a true #1, win short, win intermediate, and has the speed to get vertical as well and win deep. 

He's going to be hard to tackle after the catch, and given his athletic ability he's going to be hard to defend in and out of breaks, especially as he continues to refine his route running ability at this level, going from Maryland QB's (8 in three years / 3 OC's) to Cam will also mean a lot to his early success. 

Having Funchess, Olsen, and CMC, as legitimate receiving threats will also go a long way in allowing him to have early success as well. Guys we got a damn good receiver, and as talented as Ridley may be, his ceiling is closer to where he is right now since he's not an elite athlete vs where Moore's could be in a year or two. And if you're taking a guy in the first the ceiling should also be a factor because he's just as good as Ridley is right now. Pretty much every scouting expert believes this to be true, he was the #1 receiver in this class for a reason, at the worst #1A/B. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to derail but Reggie Bonnafon, is a ''very intriguing'' 4th HB for consideration, when you begin to consider our scheme emphasis in position flexibility, he could be a better version of Joe Webb as that multi-faceted player. 

4.4 speed, and a 43.5 in vertical, can get to the perimeter on outside runs, has the size to run inside as well (6'3 / 215), but can flex out as a receiver and is another LB / S match up problem. 

I have no idea what he may turn into, but I like the versatility and I think he can make the club as the 4th HB replacing Whittaker, as I think we should add a CJ Anderson, Alfred Morris, or Orleans Darkwa to be another complimentary between the tackles runner to CAP. 

CMC / CAP / Vet / Bonnafon -- is my early call, I like Whittaker, but at this point the UDFA is a little more intriguing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Our Top 10 pick who has yet to have a fair shake or opportunity

CMC? I think he had more than a fair opportunity to at least show he could run the ball between the tackle last season. 

CMC: 117 carries

Kamara: 120 carries 

 

I’m rooting for CMC but he better show that he can run the ball in the preseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Not to derail but Reggie Bonnafon, is a ''very intriguing'' 4th HB for consideration, when you begin to consider our scheme emphasis in position flexibility, he could be a better version of Joe Webb as that multi-faceted player. 

4.4 speed, and a 43.5 in vertical, can get to the perimeter on outside runs, has the size to run inside as well (6'3 / 215), but can flex out as a receiver and is another LB / S match up problem. 

I have no idea what he may turn into, but I like the versatility and I think he can make the club as the 4th HB replacing Whittaker, as I think we should add a CJ Anderson, Alfred Morris, or Orleans Darkwa to be another complimentary between the tackles runner to CAP. 

CMC / CAP / Vet / Bonnafon -- is my early call, I like Whittaker, but at this point the UDFA is a little more intriguing. 

Bonnafon may be the 3rd QB. Don’t see it tho. Most likely PS if we do like him that much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Carolina-Chuck18 said:

CMC? I think he had more than a fair opportunity to at least show he could run the ball between the tackle last season. 

CMC: 117 carries

Kamara: 120 carries 

 

I’m rooting for CMC but he better show that he can run the ball in the preseason. 

Kamara.   Sean Peyton

CMC          Shula

 

 

CMC would be fire in that system. And will be fire in Norvs

he needs more than a touch here or there to establish rythm. Also would be nice to not try and run behind an over complicated run scheeme that is easy to predict. A scheme that either works really good (2015), or completly fails (2017)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Carolina-Chuck18 said:

CMC? I think he had more than a fair opportunity to at least show he could run the ball between the tackle last season. 

CMC: 117 carries

Kamara: 120 carries 

 

I’m rooting for CMC but he better show that he can run the ball in the preseason. 

The thing about this comparison is NO had a legit passing attack that allowed the box to favor the offense, CMC faced more stacked boxes than Stewart last season. 

Also from Weeks 9-17, he avg'ed 4.6 ypc, that isn't something to just be dismissed either. Also in the two games in that span that he received 12+ carries, he avg'ed 4.8 ypc. CMC really caught on down the stretch and if it wasn't for a stubborn veteran favoritism towards Stewart I think we could've seen a more consistent, and explosive rushing attack, similar to CAP who also has a 4+ ypc avg on his career if memory serves. 

We held onto Stewart a season too long, and we NEEDED to get CMC or at least CAP more of the carries down the stretch. 

So to sit here and say CMC had opportunities you need to consider the nature, and environment those opportunities came in before posting as though he's to be written off as a runner when Kamara was on a much more potent offense, with an elite play-caller / play-designer in Payton. It just is what it is in that regard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Kamara.   Sean Peyton

CMC          Shula

 

 

CMC would be fire in that system. And will be fire in Norvs

he needs more than a touch here or there to establish rythm. Also would be nice to not try and run behind an over complicated run scheeme that is easy to predict. A scheme that either works really good (2015), or completly fails (2017)

Say whatever you want. I’ve seen Kamara blow through Shaq Thompson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Carolina-Chuck18 said:

Say whatever you want. I’ve seen Kamara blow through Shaq Thompson. 

I saw that too. Kamara is a beast

 

my main point is..   we need to give CMC a big workload to see exactly what we have in him. You gotta invest that time in a top 10 pick. We made the pick. Now its time to either sink or float with it. It would be weong imo to never give him to opportunity to find out

 

 

and tbh, im glad the FO agrees with me so far

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

I saw that too. Kamara is a beast

 

my main point is..   we need to give CMC a big workload to see exactly what we have in him. You gotta invest that time in a top 10 pick. We made the pick. Now its time to either sink or float with it. It would be weong imo to never give him to opportunity to find out

 

 

and tbh, im glad the FO agrees with me so far

Well you are lucky bc CMC is gonna get all the opportunity in the world to prove that he can run the rock this season. I know what kind of player he is in the passing game. I’ve said it before. I believe that CMC would easily be a 1k slot receiver every year if healthy. I just hope that we don’t ruin this kid by trying to play him at RB if he keeps showing us that he can’t do it. BB would’ve already change him into a WR by now. 

I am rooting for him to succeed at RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SetfreexX said:

We held onto Stewart a season too long, and we NEEDED to get CMC or at least CAP more of the carries down the stretch. 

I also think we held on to Shula 4 seasons to long. We'll see how well they read us now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...