Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Need New Headphones: Help!


The Huddler

Recommended Posts

I'm looking to upgrade from Apple ear buds. I want a stereo type of headset, and a good set. 

 

I love listening to Tool and System of a down, and I love to hear the loud and powerful aspects of their music. I want a pair that can handle the base drops and play it loud and clear as well as blow my head off 

 

my price limit is $300. Thats my max. I really don't wana go there but will if it makes a difference. 

 

What should I look at? 

Beats?

Bose?

 

 

How much do wireless ones cost? I guess I could look that up myself. Is there any downside to wireless ones?

 

IDC about being a cool kid, and I don't care about name brand this or that. Im not going to be walking down the street to them. I just want the best listening experience within my price range.

 

If you have any headphones that work just as good but are much cheaper than $300, then please drop em here. Hell, even like $50 ones. I want to weigh my options between best bang for my buck, and the best experience possible... 

 

Thanks!

 

Pie to anyone who replies with a legit answer. Thats all I can do Sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What source are you using to power them? A phone/mp3 player? Bose and Beats are way overpriced so unless you want a noise-cancelling headphone (Bose's is still arguably the best out there for this) then don't bother with them. Personally, I listen to similar music and am really pleased with my Audio Technica ATH-M50x. This is a rather polarizing headphone among headphone aficionados but the reviews are very good and they offer good bass performance and clarity while being pretty comfortable to wear. Tons of reviews out there and you can get them fairly cheap, especially compared to their typical MSRP.

If you're going to be listening to them indoors and not worried about bothering anyone else with them then you could consider some open-back headphones, which will generally offer a little better soundstage imaging. Otherwise stick to closed-back. Also, unless you have a headphone amplifier stick to headphones with impedance of 50 ohms or lower; for example, the Beyerdynamic DT770s in 32 ohm would work fine but the 80 ohm, 250, or 600 ohm would not work well with a typical phone or mp3 player.

This is a great general guide to see brands and general sound profiles as well as wired and wireless types.

https://sites.google.com/view/headphoneadvice/home

For example, this second link takes you to the closed-back headphones page for headphones > $200 and the M50Xs are described as having "emphasized" bass and treble with neutral mids.

https://sites.google.com/view/headphoneadvice/closed-back-headphones/category-200

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

these are nice

Skullcandy Crusher Bluetooth Wireless Over-Ear Headphones with Microphone, Noise Isolating Memory Foam, Adjustable and Immersive Stereo Haptic Bass, Rapid Charge 40-Hour Battery Life, Black https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DWH77GC/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_eLm7AbVW74Z05

 

oops i didnt see this before i asked about skull crushers

 

my only concern with them is would it sound shitty with metal?

 

theres a lot of high pitched past paced stuff in my music. I really do need a pair that can do both

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have the bose qc25

most consumer critic reviews say that they handle music that emphasizes clarity over hardness the best. i tend to agree. someone who listens to eric clapton or michael mcdonald will enjoy them very much. if you’re into something more bassy, gritty, or otherwise harder, you might want to look into a different set. i listen to a lot of dnb and the bose does not handle heavy rapid bass very well.

i don’t own a pair of skull candy headphones, but i personally used a pair just like that, and even though they are not noise canceling, they beat the bose in my book when it comes to many different genres. also they’re like half the price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Huddler said:

oops i didnt see this before i asked about skull crushers

 

my only concern with them is would it sound shitty with metal?

 

theres a lot of high pitched past paced stuff in my music. I really do need a pair that can do both

Skull crushers are awful. I returned them. Get these. Best pair I've ever owned. Great for all music and I also do sound editing.

 

Sennheiser HD 598 SR Open-Back Headphone https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06WRMZZ45/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_9Ar7Ab3N7MK76

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dex said:

Skull crushers are awful. I returned them. Get these. Best pair I've ever owned. Great for all music and I also do sound editing.

 

Sennheiser HD 598 SR Open-Back Headphone https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06WRMZZ45/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_9Ar7Ab3N7MK76

Nice. Ive had a few recomendations for Sennheiser on reddit.  So you recomend open back? 

 

Does Sennheiser have wireless ones? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Huddler said:

Nice. Ive had a few recomendations for Sennheiser on reddit.  So you recomend open back? 

 

Does Sennheiser have wireless ones? 

I don't recommend them as walk around headphones because of the long cord and need for an adapter. When you're at home an open back is fine and you get a cleaner sound. If you're looking for a walk around pair make sure they're closed back and wireless. I don't personally have a wireless pair to endorse since I use Beats for the gym and the sound isn't great. But Sennheiser is an excellent brand. Keep up the research and good luck.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dex said:

I don't recommend them as walk around headphones because of the long cord and need for an adapter. When you're at home an open back is fine and you get a cleaner sound. If you're looking for a walk around pair make sure they're closed back and wireless. I don't personally have a wireless pair to endorse since I use Beats for the gym and the sound isn't great. But Sennheiser is an excellent brand. Keep up the research and good luck.

 

 

Id eventually love to own a few different pair to have variety and to use a set for whatever desired listening expirience I want in that moment

 

for now, Im pretty sure I am going to go with a wireless closed back settup. Several really good brands recommended. I have time to figure it out though. So far at least I know which ones to cut off my list. Last thing I wana do is buy an expensive pair and be like “wtf” when I go to listen to my stuff. 

 Im gunna buy one after my last exam on Thursday as a reward for slugging through Medsurg /OB/PEDs.  That poo sucked. It would take a 28-3 kind of collapse for me to fug it up though. 

 

One day I hope to be able to have a jacked system in my car, a jacked system in my man cave, and a few different pairs of jacked headphones for different uses, kind of like if i had several sports cars or trucks as a rich mother fuger

 

in due time. Ive spent so much time listening to music over the past few years its time for an upgrade. Its definitely enhanced my life and pulled me through some pretty grueling times and most importanly helped me learn from those times. Im sick of having to use a casset adapter for my 96 ford ranger and using apple earbuds that hurt the fug out of earholes and give me headaches. 

 

First step in my wishlist is just getting a nice, balanced set that can hit the highs and blast the lows that I can take around with me in public or wear around the house..

 

 

 

i need to stop stalling and get back to studying FML lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn the Tankers are already out here talking bout tanking?  
    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
×
×
  • Create New...