Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remember Deshaun Foster?


solidkjames

Recommended Posts

I keep reading in the paper and on various message boards that Jake is our best QB so we have to go with him. Ok, isn't John Fox the same head coach who ran Deshaun over DeAngelo for 2 or 3 years before finally realizing he was making a mistake? Same thing goes for Jake, eventually he will have to suck up his pride and bench the man because everyone who looks at the Panthers sees the same thing we all do. A QB who is making the offense one dimensional and having the head coach adjust to his weak arm instead of replacing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep reading in the paper and on various message boards that Jake is our best QB so we have to go with him. Ok, isn't John Fox the same head coach who ran Deshaun over DeAngelo for 2 or 3 years before finally realizing he was making a mistake? Same thing goes for Jake, eventually he will have to suck up his pride and bench the man because everyone who looks at the Panthers sees the same thing we all do. A QB who is making the offense one dimensional and having the head coach adjust to his weak arm instead of replacing him.

From what I remember we went through the same thing with Stephen Davis. I believe it finally took Davis to step down from the starting nod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and there was a list a mile long by some why DeAngelo shouldn't be given the role and Fumblin Foster was still the best option despite his faults.

NEWSFLASH - when a player sucks EPIC BALLS like Jake and Foster. You bench them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and there was a list a mile long by some why DeAngelo shouldn't be given the role and Fumblin Foster was still the best option despite his faults.

NEWSFLASH - when a player sucks EPIC BALLS like Jake and Foster. You bench them.

Word!

You can't keep saying we don't have better options without knowing what Moore is capable of doing in the field. And to find out, you have to play him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't forget that our O-line sucked EPIC BALLS every second that foster started on this team.

DeAngelo made plays behind that same OL. DeAngelo didn't hurt the team each week.

Foster left and went to SF....the only time you probably saw him last year is when Singletary ripped his head of and shiat down his neck for fumbling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DeAngelo made plays behind that same OL. DeAngelo didn't hurt the team each week.

Foster left and went to SF....the only time you probably saw him last year is when Singletary ripped his head of and shiat down his neck for fumbling.

and foster didn't hurt the team when he was running behind davis. i'm not getting down on williams or saying foster was any good, i'm saying that the whole offense improved greatly at the same time williams was promoted to starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and foster didn't hurt the team when he was running behind davis. i'm not getting down on williams or saying foster was any good, i'm saying that the whole offense improved greatly at the same time williams was promoted to starter.

but in 07 Foster hurt the team and DeAngelo was running behind the same line and showed he was a better option....that is the point.

The 2003 season earned many guys too many extra years. Fosters' 03 season was highly overrated b/c of 2 plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but in 07 Foster hurt the team and DeAngelo was running behind the same line and showed he was a better option....that is the point.

The 2003 season earned many guys too many extra years. Fosters' 03 season was highly overrated b/c of 2 plays.

That is continuing right now with our QB situation. John Fox is too loyal to one of the worst QB's in the league. At one time Jake was halfway decent, those years are LONG GONE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revisionist history at its best. Foster started because he was the best back in 2006 and the first part of 2007. With his continued fumbles, decreasing YPC and William's increased grasp of pass blocking and willingness to run between the tackles instead of always take it outside, DeAngelo emerged as a legitimate option and consequently got more playing time until he was the feature back at the end of the season. He was soft in 2007 and was called out by Testeverde for not wanting to be in there every play and giving 100%. He many times would pull himself out for a blow after a long run or a series or two. It wasn't until 2008 that he actually worked out seriously and put 100% into it and the results were amazing.

Fox put him in there when he was the best option and showed he could do the job. Just like he put in Stewart sparingly at first and has worked him more as he has developed and picked up the pass blocking in particular. This whole "only going with vets and being too loyal" flies in the face of the fact that we have started several rookies over veterans over the past several years right out of the box. These urban legends get repeated so much people think they are true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and there was a list a mile long by some why DeAngelo shouldn't be given the role and Fumblin Foster was still the best option despite his faults.

NEWSFLASH - when a player sucks EPIC BALLS like Jake and Foster. You bench them.

They were talking about this on the radio...gantt was saying fox just does not trust the young guys..this is the reason why jarrett is on the bench..and gets passed two only twice the entire year.:mad:...when are passing game sucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...