Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Panthers Considering switch to 3-4


TheCasillas

Does a 3-4 defense excite you?  

133 members have voted

  1. 1. Does a 3-4 defense excite you?

    • Yes
      78
    • No
      54


Recommended Posts

Or since the NFL is moving to a more hybrid / match up game, doesn't it make sense to have at least one good pass rushing OLB?  have them come in and play either a rush end in 4-3 or a Rush LB in 3-4?

Or am I missing something really obvious....probably...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, d-dave said:

Or since the NFL is moving to a more hybrid / match up game, doesn't it make sense to have at least one good pass rushing OLB?  have them come in and play either a rush end in 4-3 or a Rush LB in 3-4?

Or am I missing something really obvious....probably...

By and large, I think way too much is made of the whole 4-3 vs. 3-4 at this point. The nickel package has been the NFL base defense for years now. 

I wouldn't be surprised if 3-3-5 looks start infiltrating the NFL much like spread offenses have. That defensive look has been gaining steam at the college level as a counter to the spread offenses. Maybe not as a base, but I could certainly see some teams incorporating it as an additional wrinkle, especially on obvious passing downs. Lots of interesting blitz packages with that front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

And you didn't cherry pick with TJ Watt?

I respect the hell out of Wade Phillips as a defensive coach, but he's never been a GM and modern contracts pretty clearly illustrate that his opinion on the matter may no longer be relevant.

modern contracts? Modern contracts are a universal point for great players. Great players get paid great player money. He is, rightfully, talking about a defensive front as a unit.

The point isn't tj watt. The point is that the steelers draft tj watt every single season at the back half of the 1st round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

You figure out the numerical discrepancy and let me know how big of a difference that is?? Smh 

At some point dude you're just arguing just to argue.. 

Lets just end it with a agree to disagree and move on..

ah, a concession, finally

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the majority of the innovation of the game has been driven by the college level for quite awhile now. It makes sense. Football is a very physical game where you can physically overwhelm your opposition much more so than any other team sport. If you don't have elite talent like those programs that are constantly in the top 10 (Bama, Clemson, OSU, OU, etc.) you better cook up something different schematically to try to give yourself a chance to compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

modern contracts? Modern contracts are a universal point for great players. Great players get paid great player money. He is, rightfully, talking about a defensive front as a unit.

The point isn't tj watt. The point is that the steelers draft tj watt every single season at the back half of the 1st round.

The Steelers do it with RBs too. They just do a great job of evaluating and drafting talent, period. It has nothing to do with 4-3 vs. 3-4. 

If you look at the top paid defensive players, it's a pretty even mix of 4-3 and 3-4 players with the top two being 3-4 OLBs. That's just fact. No opinion forming necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 other tantalizing points here.

1) this offense has been traditionally embarrassed by 3-4 defenses (most notably in the super bowl... Against wade Phillips) and facing that defense every day and bettering ourselves because of it is a savory prospect

2) wed be the only team in the division doing it, offering up a slew of benefits, meaning we won't be competing with division rivals for prospects, and making us uniquely tough to prepare for, while railroading them into drafting players high for no other purpose than beating us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

The Steelers do it with RBs too. They just do a great job of evaluating and drafting talent, period. It has nothing to do with 4-3 vs. 3-4. 

If you look at the top paid defensive players, it's a pretty even mix of 4-3 and 3-4 players with the top two being 3-4 OLBs. That's just fact. No opinion forming necessary.

The steelers aren't drafting Johnny lunchpail from Work Hard U lol.

They're acquiring some of the highest rated prospects in the class in the back half of the 1st round because teams are busy trading away massive draft capital to move up into the 1st half to take Marcus Davenport because they're desperate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

The steelers aren't drafting Johnny lunchpail from Work Hard U lol.

They're acquiring some of the highest rated prospects in the class in the back half of the 1st round because teams are busy trading away massive draft capital to move up into the 1st half to take Marcus Davenport because they're desperate.

Did you have a point you were trying to make or are you just arguing just for the sake of argument?

It's also ironic you talk about them specifically not drafting "Johnny Lunchpail from Work Hard U" when this was the breakdown of your favorite player TJ Watt from NFL.com:

BOTTOM LINE

 A long-limbed effort rusher who posted impressive numbers against the run and pass in just one year as a starter. He is a tireless worker who pursues from snap to whistle and his brother, J.J., will be a tremendous resource for technique and pass-rush plan. While he is unlikely to win a race to the edge, he's a plus run defender who can get to the quarterback with plus hand work and relentless effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2019 at 9:51 AM, usmcpanthers said:

That kind of change doesn't happen overnight, it takes a couple of seasons. But our D couldn't be much worse than it was last year.

I say no.

McCarthy hired Dom Capers in Green Bay and went from 6-10 without him the previous year to 11-5 with him and a Playoff birth. Won the Lombardi the 2nd year. Key is to grab a great NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kevin Greene said:

I say no.

McCarthy hired Dom Capers in Green Bay and went from 6-10 without him the previous year to 11-5 with him and a Playoff birth. Won the Lombardi the 2nd year. Key is to grab a great NT.

We already have a NT at 346 lbs.  Now how good he will be at this point of his career is a question I can’t answer. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Did you have a point you were trying to make or are you just arguing just for the sake of argument?

It's also ironic you talk about them specifically not drafting "Johnny Lunchpail from Work Hard U" when this was the breakdown of your favorite player TJ Watt from NFL.com:

BOTTOM LINE

 A long-limbed effort rusher who posted impressive numbers against the run and pass in just one year as a starter. He is a tireless worker who pursues from snap to whistle and his brother, J.J., will be a tremendous resource for technique and pass-rush plan. While he is unlikely to win a race to the edge, he's a plus run defender who can get to the quarterback with plus hand work and relentless effort.

and are you legitimately trying to contend that tj watt wasn't one of the premiere 34 prospects in the class?

lol at citing the draft savants at NFL.com applying white guy label to white player. His stock was what it was and has manifested as what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

and are you legitimately trying to contend that tj watt wasn't one of the premiere 34 prospects in the class?

lol at citing the draft savants at NFL.com applying white guy label to white player. His stock was what it was and has manifested as what it is.

You don't go in the 1st round unless you're a pretty damn good prospect. I think you're just arguing yourself in circles because you honestly don't even know what point you're trying to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...