Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Combine Thread


ncfan

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

See my edit. I mainly just looked at NFL.com. Dillard is universally ahead of Risner and only one case was Little. If Bradbury is getting more hype Risner seems like a candidate to fall to 47. Little looked like garbage but everyone seems to love Dillard. Not me.

I dont know

The only ones ive seen that had Dillard ahead were those ones on nfl.com especially after senior bowl week

Its a toss up with Little

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, stbugs said:

It’s funny that people bash the combine but damn it’s pretty easy to separate some people. It’s not perfect but that little segment showing James Daniels (freaking loves him last year) swinging hips open to come off a double team and get the twisting DT was perfect. It showed which guys could make that and which would let Trubisky get trucked. 

With respect, there is Orlando Brown Jr.

Dude had a terrible combine.  Looked weak, slow, said dumb things.  Then he becomes a 3rd round pick and turned out to be a quality OT for the Ravens.

To me, the combine is just part of the process.  You have to look at both the game tape, and use the combine to see if your earlier scouting was right.  But sometimes, it's just wrong.  We see combine stars flame out, as well as combine loser turn into ALL Pros.  If the dude can make the block, the combine doesn't do a whole lot to change that in the case of an OL.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, d-dave said:

With respect, there is Orlando Brown Jr.

Dude had a terrible combine.  Looked weak, slow, said dumb things.  Then he becomes a 3rd round pick and turned out to be a quality OT for the Ravens.

To me, the combine is just part of the process.  You have to look at both the game tape, and use the combine to see if your earlier scouting was right.  But sometimes, it's just wrong.  We see combine stars flame out, as well as combine loser turn into ALL Pros.  If the dude can make the block, the combine doesn't do a whole lot to change that in the case of an OL.

 

Yeah, but that guy was also a very good college OT. Little hasn't been. He's a his everyone always expects to be great but then he's just not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, but that guy was also a very good college OT. Little hasn't been. He's a his everyone always expects to be great but then he's just not.

I know nothing about Little =)  So I will defer that to you other experts.  I'm just an internet douchebag after all.

My point was that the combine shouldn't be a sink or swim for an OL.  But if Little's college tape is that bad, it will be exacerbated by the combine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know there were some people on here high on Holyfield, but 4.79/4.81 might make him undraftable. I just can't think of any successful NFL RBs who ran that slow. The holes usually close fast in the NFL and those LBs pursue hard. At some point, you just don't have the prerequisite speed to get to where you need to go quickly enough. I seriously doubt Holyfield translates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Suffice it to say the combine isn’t just Olympics. The drills are what really interest me. Little couldn’t swing his hips well in the 45 yard side to side back pedal and his footwork was terrible in the mirror drill. NFL Network did a great job of highlighting a rookie C who did the drill in a pass block and you could see which guys would be able to make that play on the drill. It’s the TE drills that made me like Thomas last year and not like Gesicki. Gesicki was a freak in the numbers but you could tell he wasn’t as good a real TE as Thomas. He didn’t catch naturally and didn’t run the drills well. Kind of like a RB. You can’t measure the vision. That said if you run a 4.8, it won’t matter how good your vision is because you can’t get to the hole anyway. 

Yep, I said last year during thw Combine that I thought Ian Thomas had a chance to end up being the best TE in that draft. I was thrilled when we picked him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...