Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Path to the Draft - Panthers' 2019 War Room: Projecting Carolina's Selections


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

I love Brooks and Baldy but this left me confused..They are usually correct with their breakdowns on this team .............but.  ....When did we lose Moton last season??

They mean we lost Matt Kalil and Darryl at the same time at one point. Moton was listed on the left and Darryl on the right so they put both tackles behind them. Each has competition and backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JARROD said:

They mean we lost Matt Kalil and Darryl at the same time at one point. Moton was listed on the left and Darryl on the right so they put both tackles behind them. Each has competition and backup.

Yeah that's a terrible idea.. I don't know a team in NFL history that drafted 1st 2 rounds competition for both Tackle positions?? Lol

So where is the competition for Obada/cox  who most likely will be starting in our base 4/3..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

Yeah that's a terrible idea.. I don't know a team in NFL history that drafted 1st 2 rounds competition for both Tackle positions?? Lol

So where is the competition for Obada/cox  who most likely will be starting in our base 4/3..

I can’t disagree with them. If we drafted 2 DE or 2 OT or split them or split them with OT OG or DE DT or DE OLB, can’t disagree with any of them.

Hurney has double dipped plenty of times, so he’s not above it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been saying this for weeks. If the top 3 or 4 DE's are off the board, we go T. Guaranteed 1st game starter. Some D-lineman need a year or 2 to come into their own. We can get a DE in the 2nd that can "contribute and rotate" in their 1st season an develop into a FT DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JARROD said:

I can’t disagree with them. If we drafted 2 DE or 2 OT or split them or split them with OT OG or DE DT or DE OLB, can’t disagree with any of them.

Hurney has double dipped plenty of times, so he’s not above it.

You do realize we are going into this season with our best edge rushers being over 30 on 1 year deals??

And this is the best Dline draft in decades?? 

I would literally voodoo curse Hurney if he fuged up that bad.  If this was a smart plan there was no need at all in signing Dwill back..  You can keep that money draft your 2 tackles and signed another vet edge rusher..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, musicman said:

I've been saying this for weeks. If the top 3 or 4 DE's are off the board, we go T. Guaranteed 1st game starter. Some D-lineman need a year or 2 to come into their own. We can get a DE in the 2nd that can "contribute and rotate" in their 1st season an develop into a FT DE.

I have no problem if we draft J Will or Cody in the 1st (because they both can play guard) and then mix a double dip of Dlinemen and a free safety with the next 3 picks.  That's a good plan as well in my book..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...