Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Path to the Draft - Panthers' 2019 War Room: Projecting Carolina's Selections

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

I love Brooks and Baldy but this left me confused..They are usually correct with their breakdowns on this team .............but.  ....When did we lose Moton last season??

They mean we lost Matt Kalil and Darryl at the same time at one point. Moton was listed on the left and Darryl on the right so they put both tackles behind them. Each has competition and backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sub Zero Rising Star

Sub Zero

Posted
Posted
Just now, JARROD said:

They mean we lost Matt Kalil and Darryl at the same time at one point. Moton was listed on the left and Darryl on the right so they put both tackles behind them. Each has competition and backup.

Yeah that's a terrible idea.. I don't know a team in NFL history that drafted 1st 2 rounds competition for both Tackle positions?? Lol

So where is the competition for Obada/cox  who most likely will be starting in our base 4/3..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

Yeah that's a terrible idea.. I don't know a team in NFL history that drafted 1st 2 rounds competition for both Tackle positions?? Lol

So where is the competition for Obada/cox  who most likely will be starting in our base 4/3..

I can’t disagree with them. If we drafted 2 DE or 2 OT or split them or split them with OT OG or DE DT or DE OLB, can’t disagree with any of them.

Hurney has double dipped plenty of times, so he’s not above it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
musicman Proficient

musicman

Posted
Posted

I've been saying this for weeks. If the top 3 or 4 DE's are off the board, we go T. Guaranteed 1st game starter. Some D-lineman need a year or 2 to come into their own. We can get a DE in the 2nd that can "contribute and rotate" in their 1st season an develop into a FT DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sub Zero Rising Star

Sub Zero

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, JARROD said:

I can’t disagree with them. If we drafted 2 DE or 2 OT or split them or split them with OT OG or DE DT or DE OLB, can’t disagree with any of them.

Hurney has double dipped plenty of times, so he’s not above it.

You do realize we are going into this season with our best edge rushers being over 30 on 1 year deals??

And this is the best Dline draft in decades?? 

I would literally voodoo curse Hurney if he fuged up that bad.  If this was a smart plan there was no need at all in signing Dwill back..  You can keep that money draft your 2 tackles and signed another vet edge rusher..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sub Zero Rising Star

Sub Zero

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, musicman said:

I've been saying this for weeks. If the top 3 or 4 DE's are off the board, we go T. Guaranteed 1st game starter. Some D-lineman need a year or 2 to come into their own. We can get a DE in the 2nd that can "contribute and rotate" in their 1st season an develop into a FT DE.

I have no problem if we draft J Will or Cody in the 1st (because they both can play guard) and then mix a double dip of Dlinemen and a free safety with the next 3 picks.  That's a good plan as well in my book..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By CRA · Posted

      yeah, I can get a little of that.  But that's not what he is posting in his argument just now though.   He said people wouldn't even concede to the literal ability to do it when pressed on the literal ability.  I have never seen that.  He maintains it exists somewhere.  I mean, using anomaly games to make arguments about players just isn't the way.   There wasn't a defender within 10 yards of our guys on 2 of those 3 throws Sunday.  No one within 5 on the 3rd.   That's not Bryce Young answering questions about his play downfield..  That's Bryce Young taking advantage of coverage busts by a bad D.  Which hey, that's part of the game too.  Recognition and seeing the field.   It can't totally be dismissed.   That's still good play.  You want your QBs to make those plays.  But it's not getting into the long standing critique of BY IMO.   
    • strato
      Adam Thielen on Young

      By strato · Posted

      Deserved, I wouldn’t use that word. Asked for? For sure. Am I upset over it? No.  People forget that AT was throwing his helmet in frustration last season over his QB’s ineptitude. The same QB was pretty inept to start this year, no guarantee AT would have helped him in those games any more than he did last year.  Just sayin.  And Dan doing him a solid probably did not go unnoticed by players around the league. I think it increases his rep with potential FAs. It sure can’t hurt it. 
    • kungfoodude
      Adam Thielen on Young

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      You think that was the fault of the guy that was lighting it up or maybe the bums around him? Funnily enough, those bums are still being bums in his absence. Who would have thought!
×
×
  • Create New...