Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barclays Premier League- 2019/20 Season Thread


Shocker

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Shocker said:

Wolves will have a hard enough time beating Liverpool today without a VAR disallowed goal by a gnat whisker.  Shet has to change.  What bullshet

I agree, I hate that VAR disallows good goals by a red-headed c@nt hair of a toe's length.

But the fact is that that is what they've been doing for every team this season (Liverpool have lost two important goals this season because of "armpits" being offside and others because the head or the foot were off the length of a gnat-whisker... been there, done that).  And, by the way the league has been "measuring" it all season, the Wolverhampton player's toe *was* "off".

They need to change it so that offside on VAR is only called if it is clear and obvious that either the foot or the head are offside.  If it is only "millimeters" of "offside", then fug that poo.

But, again, they shouldn't change it now because that's the way they've been judging it for all teams all season now.  Change it for Summer 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, tiger7_88 said:

They need to change it so that offside on VAR is only called if it is clear and obvious that either the foot or the head are offside.  If it is only "millimeters" of "offside", then fug that poo.

I could get behind this idea. Also agree that it should wait until next season, but I'm sure they've been and will be reevaluating a lot of things over the next several months in regards to VAR. It's still a recent addition, and everyone and their brother is still getting accustomed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ARSEN said:

Offside should be based on legs and not the body like who’s middle finger is longer.

I'd go one further and say foot position, and as tiger said earlier, egregiously further up the pitch. This way, neither tall nor short guys have an advantage depending on the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was nice to see Arsenal so much more organized and playing better.  Arsenal is the one London team that I can stand pulling for, lol.

My Reds were a damn machine yesterday against a pretty darned good Sheffield squad.  Best performance of the season for them by far, IMO.

Gonna be nice to finally get Fabhino and the two injured, senior center-backs (Matip and Lovren) back soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Valid points.  This article to me explained why they might take the chance with 2 proven veteran Guards and focus limited resources elsewhere.  If you sign a free agent, you spend $10m more than you are paying Corbett and Christensen.  If you draft a C, you have a rookie QB on the LOS in front of Bryce.  Maybe this is their only practical option, since there were many other needs that could not be staffed by currently rostered vets or rookies.  For example, they wanted a "type" at RB.  I said it before--if you look at RB and say, "Chuba had 900 yards behind a bad line!" that would be a great point.  However, he was very weak as a pass catcher and pass blocker when he arrived--he has shown promise as a pass catcher and some growth as a pass blocker.  In 2023, one site rated him the 25th best overall RB in the NFL among the top 72 "starters."  https://www.nfl.com/news/rb-index-ranking-all-72-starting-running-backs-from-the-2023-nfl-season Brooks is elite at Running, receiving, and is good at blocking.  We are better, and the pass catching with his YAC keeps defenses more honest that Chuba did.  How many sacks came after Chuba missed his block?  I dunno, but I saw it more than a few times.  We could not bring in a TE to find a weapon for Bryce.  We had to draft one.  So we had to draft WR, RB, and TE because we had no real options.  So if you look at the big picture, based on the information in the article as foundational knowledge of the C position, the fact that Corbett has never played center is not as important as his ability to play it.  But yes, it is not a given and it is risky--but it is one of the few positions we could upgrade (since we signed 2 stud Gs) with players already on the roster.  It is not ideal, but rebuilding a team with so many holes is impossible in one offseason.  When you laid out the options at every position and looked at the available cap room, this is probably the best option for the Panthers so they can address other needs where there are no options on the roster.
    • Yeah, I'm with you here. Nothing is 100% but so far I've been impressed by our new leaders. I thought the draft moves were great. I can't believe we got a 2nd next season and still got our targets with our first 2 picks. That was badass. Morgan is a dawg too. We can't forget that. Just look at those eyes. Morgan is intense.  
×
×
  • Create New...