Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To the people who say Moore isnt the answer


Nu Guns

Recommended Posts

Most people here dont think hes a golden knight , but he can not be any worse then the worst starting qb in the Nfl.

Let Moore play seven games and if he does not produce more then 17 turnovers during that stretch he is a better option. no ??

Sincerely,

Matt Moore is our Tom Brady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People keep saying "well he can't be any worse" but the truth is that he absolutely can be worse. But hell, I'd like to see him start just to see what happens and make the games more interesting. I've given up on the playoffs/winning season thing already.

I really do not know that he can be worse, honestly... Not for an extended period, because he'd be benched. Sure, it's possible to be worse than Jake (the Panthers could play me, for instance. :-D)... but I don't think that if someone came in and was WORSE than Jake they'd get much more than a couple games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really do not know that he can be worse, honestly... Not for an extended period, because he'd be benched. Sure, it's possible to be worse than Jake (the Panthers could play me, for instance. :-D)... but I don't think that if someone came in and was WORSE than Jake they'd get much more than a couple games.

And then what? So Jake isn't the answer and then Moore isn't either. So do we go with Feeley, bring Jake back or suffer with Moore the rest of the way. It is widely accepted that when you replace the starter you don't go back to him. Sure Philly did it but just as often it blows up the other way. So you need to be sure you are replacing Jake with an upgrade not just trying something to see what happens. And if you think things can't get worst you are wrong. Just think David Carr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then what? So Jake isn't the answer and then Moore isn't either. So do we go with Feeley, bring Jake back or suffer with Moore the rest of the way. It is widely accepted that when you replace the starter you don't go back to him. Sure Philly did it but just as often it blows up the other way. So you need to be sure you are replacing Jake with an upgrade not just trying something to see what happens. And if you think things can't get worst you are wrong. Just think David Carr.

A loss is a loss, whether your QB is a glove wearing pretty boy or a retarded cajun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the people who don't think matt moore is the answer are retards. the starting quarterback sucks and causes us to lose, any logical coach is going to put the backup in which in this case is matt moore.

49ers did it and their qb simply wasn't making plays, not turning the ball over all the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then what? So Jake isn't the answer and then Moore isn't either. So do we go with Feeley, bring Jake back or suffer with Moore the rest of the way. It is widely accepted that when you replace the starter you don't go back to him. Sure Philly did it but just as often it blows up the other way. So you need to be sure you are replacing Jake with an upgrade not just trying something to see what happens. And if you think things can't get worst you are wrong. Just think David Carr.

Wow, way to regurgitate things that have been said for a month now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then what? So Jake isn't the answer and then Moore isn't either. So do we go with Feeley, bring Jake back or suffer with Moore the rest of the way. It is widely accepted that when you replace the starter you don't go back to him. Sure Philly did it but just as often it blows up the other way. So you need to be sure you are replacing Jake with an upgrade not just trying something to see what happens. And if you think things can't get worst you are wrong. Just think David Carr.

It is NOT unusual for a QB to come back in after being replaced, especially if it's a long term starter that is expected to do well.

If Moore struggles as badly as Delhomme did, then you will see Jake make a re-appearance... Assuming Delhomme is ever replaced in the first place.

Jake was only replaced with Carr due to injury - he was a downgrade, but that is a different situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is NOT unusual for a QB to come back in after being replaced, especially if it's a long term starter that is expected to do well.

If Moore struggles as badly as Delhomme did, then you will see Jake make a re-appearance... Assuming Delhomme is ever replaced in the first place.

Jake was only replaced with Carr due to injury - he was a downgrade, but that is a different situation.

And if Moore sucks and Jake comes back in and isn't better then what??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guarantee it makes a difference. Give up 2 scores and its basically over until garbage time. The offense can barely drive the length of the field in 3 quarters. The defense has been gutted to build around a QB that is possibly the biggest bust in NFL history. For what we've put into the offense the past 3 years, we should be dropping 30 bombs with regularity. The only 30s we get are FGs. 
    • Not according to some fly by night fantasy crusader!  There were 10 drops that should have netted Bryce another 450 yards and 7 TD’s 
    • What? Am I mistaken that his rookie year included a horrible coaching staff and support players.   It's wasn't just Bryce.  I won't judge any player from that yeah.  It's impossible to make an accurate assessment on any player under those conditions. It's that simple. You break down each play and look at each player, what the expectation was, what happened during the play and what circumstances affected every player and position. There a reason why the narrative was he could be the biggest NFL bust in history.  Then after his benching he started to show remarkable improvement. Thus all the talk from fans and media about how dramatic of a turnaround it was and that Carolina no longer had a QB problem. First game this year the whole team stunk it up.  Why?  Plenty of blame to go around including Bryce. Improvements do not come it a nice straight line angling up.  I think Sunday was a step back for the whole team.  Still plenty of time to see if it was a bad outing to grow from or another indicator of issues that can't be overcome.
×
×
  • Create New...