Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We all Know Jake Sux, But what about receivers?


Mojoman

Recommended Posts

Zero touchdowns by the wide receivers? Is Jake the ONLY problem with the passing game? Moose and Jarret are too slow, both in terms of speed and quickness to get any separation. Why does it seem that other teams find a way to sometimes get receivers to be 'wide open' and our guys rarely do?

Question 2: What ever happened to concept of putting Mike Goodson in as a slot receiver. I thought he was supposed to have good hands and be fast enough to be a down field threat? I would like to see Deangelo throw the ball occasionally too on an option play. Come on Fox, grow some balls and try something new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

really when a wr is "wide ope" it is because of blown coverage. there have been times wr are wide open, but jake hasnt thrown to them. our wide recievers to dont seem to be open because when jake throws ot to them it is either over thrown, under thrown or shouldnt have been trhrown. also i dont think it is a issue of seperation either on moose or jarrett. they are posession type wrs, they wont ever beat you with speed. Many posters forget that Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin both are slower recievers but Larry is one the top WRs in the game. they use their body and route running to sheild defenders from the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the only WRs we can talk about are Moose and Smith. Jarrett and Moore have even gotten enough reps to even consider them part of the group. But, going 95% of the time on passing plays w/ only Moose and Smith or just Smith on the field probably gives us the best chance to win per Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course there are problems with the receivers, but the main problem in the offense is undoubtedly Delhomme (and playcalling).

And we've actually thrown a decent number of passes DeAngelo's way, if I'm not mistaken. I think lining Goodson up in the slot would be a good call, and I'd like to see Rosario used more (perhaps even lining up wide).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

other than Steve Smith, its true that our WR's suck..thats basicly why smitty is double covered every play of the game..teams arent threated by moose or jarrett..and that combined with jake passing it to them makes for not alot of completions and a rediculous passing game..

we need a qb who can pass the ball accurately with some velocity..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

other than Steve Smith, its true that our WR's suck..thats basicly why smitty is double covered every play of the game..teams arent threated by moose or jarrett..and that combined with jake passing it to them makes for not alot of completions and a rediculous passing game..

we need a qb who can pass the ball accurately with some velocity..

do you know how many offensive snaps Smitty has been on the field w/ acutal WRs other than Moose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • “Y’all been watching film, huh? That’s cool, watch this.”
    • Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. I guess I thought he was after Kasay. 
    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
×
×
  • Create New...