Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players’ Social Media Reactions

LUUUUUKE

By LUUUUUKE,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Oldmanrivera Enthusiast

Oldmanrivera

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Kinographer said:

He's been skating on thin ice here for almost his entire tenure. I get that he's a great guy to be around, but it was time for him to go. There's really no reason for players to be posting what reads like eulogies. poo, there's a good chance he ends up landing in Dallas or Cleveland and end up in a better position than he was here. There is no reason to shed tears for Riverboat Ron.

lol jesus christ man, no one is shedding tears, they are just showing their appreciation for the dude. on the question of if he should have been gone a long time ago or not, does not remove the nuances of interpersonal interactions with all the players he impacted. And it is really strange that you take the positive nature of the players reactions as a moment to attack Ron. Get the fug over yourself. Football is beyond a team sport, and incorporates individuals you dont see on the field, that doesnt mean they dont have impact.

There really isnt a reason to have a negative reaction to these players responding

 

go be unnecessarily negative by yourself

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBiii Newbie

SBiii

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, The Huddler said:

pretty much the same as the other retards

In the past the use of "retard" was a bannable offense...

...it appears this is no longer the case?

@LinvilleGorge is this no longer the case?  Is "retard" now in-bounds?

No worries either way from my side but just curious about the rules on this word.  As much as I've seen it tossed around in the last few months I'm hard pressed to see how it could be ruled out-of-bounds....

....but, before using it personally I'd like to have the issue clarified.

What say ye?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, SBiii said:

In the past the use of "retard" was a bannable offense...

...it appears this is no longer the case?

@LinvilleGorge is this no longer the case?  Is "retard" now in-bounds?

No worries either way from my side but just curious about the rules on this word.  As much as I've seen it tossed around in the last few months I'm hard pressed to see how it could be ruled out-of-bounds....

....but, before using it personally I'd like to have the issue clarified.

What say ye?

There's a lot of other words to choose. Be decent and choose one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBiii Newbie

SBiii

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's a lot of other words to choose. Be decent and choose one.

Are there any ramifications if that one is chosen? 

Based on what's been hurled at me over time it doesn't appear so....

....could you specifically clarify for @The Huddler (and myself) please?

Is the use of "retard" allowed?  Or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBiii Newbie

SBiii

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Can y'all kids just act right?

Got it, the use of "retard" is now in-bounds. 

(which suits me just fine, it's simply a colloquialism in the estimation of most folks...non-retards if you will ;0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion in Here)

      By CRA · Posted

      PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • strato
      Vet QB Options - Trade/Cut/FA Edition

      By strato · Posted

      Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • kungfoodude
      Vet QB Options - Trade/Cut/FA Edition

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...