Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players’ Social Media Reactions


LUUUUUKE

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Kinographer said:

He's been skating on thin ice here for almost his entire tenure. I get that he's a great guy to be around, but it was time for him to go. There's really no reason for players to be posting what reads like eulogies. poo, there's a good chance he ends up landing in Dallas or Cleveland and end up in a better position than he was here. There is no reason to shed tears for Riverboat Ron.

lol jesus christ man, no one is shedding tears, they are just showing their appreciation for the dude. on the question of if he should have been gone a long time ago or not, does not remove the nuances of interpersonal interactions with all the players he impacted. And it is really strange that you take the positive nature of the players reactions as a moment to attack Ron. Get the fug over yourself. Football is beyond a team sport, and incorporates individuals you dont see on the field, that doesnt mean they dont have impact.

There really isnt a reason to have a negative reaction to these players responding

 

go be unnecessarily negative by yourself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Huddler said:

pretty much the same as the other retards

In the past the use of "retard" was a bannable offense...

...it appears this is no longer the case?

@LinvilleGorge is this no longer the case?  Is "retard" now in-bounds?

No worries either way from my side but just curious about the rules on this word.  As much as I've seen it tossed around in the last few months I'm hard pressed to see how it could be ruled out-of-bounds....

....but, before using it personally I'd like to have the issue clarified.

What say ye?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SBiii said:

In the past the use of "retard" was a bannable offense...

...it appears this is no longer the case?

@LinvilleGorge is this no longer the case?  Is "retard" now in-bounds?

No worries either way from my side but just curious about the rules on this word.  As much as I've seen it tossed around in the last few months I'm hard pressed to see how it could be ruled out-of-bounds....

....but, before using it personally I'd like to have the issue clarified.

What say ye?

There's a lot of other words to choose. Be decent and choose one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's a lot of other words to choose. Be decent and choose one.

Are there any ramifications if that one is chosen? 

Based on what's been hurled at me over time it doesn't appear so....

....could you specifically clarify for @The Huddler (and myself) please?

Is the use of "retard" allowed?  Or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Can y'all kids just act right?

Got it, the use of "retard" is now in-bounds. 

(which suits me just fine, it's simply a colloquialism in the estimation of most folks...non-retards if you will ;0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...