Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If, for sure, Cam was not against playing '20 w/o an extension


(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Recommended Posts

How would that make everybody feel, then?

I am curious to know.

Under this scenario, where he has no gripes about playing out the last year of his contract, he would be costing 20 million against the cap

If we sign a free agent QB we will undoubtedly be spending more than 20 million ..

For 20 million - why the hell wouldn't we give Cam a chance to show he can stay healthy. I don't like this "..when he is healthy.." talk .. he will get healthy again. Will he stay healthy is the question.

But for 20 million .. why would we not keep Newton around. Talk to the contrary is so that public excitement is that much more when Newton actually does return, and return in a big way. Public will be even more pumped than normal because they thought Cam was leaving.

The ultimate question of this thread though - I've saw it thrown around that Newton may not want to play without an extension - the question is, if he was completely fine with not being extended, then how do you feel about the situation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cam has no problem not being extended before playing, then it is an absolute no brainer that we keep him.

And absolutely nothing suggests Cam not wanting to play unless he is extended.

I'm telling you. Everybody is wrong that thinks there is a chance Cam is leaving.

The media wants to fool you so you are surprised when Cam returns.

I won't be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

That’s the idea. Everyone is tired of your threads. Mostly because they are the same repetitive pop over and over and over again

Cam is kind of important to the Carolina Panthers .. and we're on a Panthers forum .. expect some Cam threads around here .. especially threads that don't have him out the door.

I create the rare threads that have Cam staying when every other thread about Cam, and there are many of them, have Cam going away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

Cam is kind of important to the Carolina Panthers .. and we're on a Panthers forum .. expect some Cam threads around here .. especially threads that don't have him out the door.

I create the rare threads that have Cam staying when every other thread about Cam, and there are many of them, have Cam going away.

No, you create the same BS threads over and over and over. I’ve been a member here for well over a decade my dude. I know how to spot the poo posters when I see them. Take care

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

No, you create the same BS threads over and over and over. I’ve been a member here for well over a decade my dude. I know how to spot the poo posters when I see them. Take care

Yeah .. I knew there was absolutely no chance Cam Newton left and everybody else thought he was gone.

You are a bad fan. You actually think Cam Newton leaves this team lol .. no chance, people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

Cam is kind of important to the Carolina Panthers .. and we're on a Panthers forum .. expect some Cam threads around here .. especially threads that don't have him out the door.

I create the rare threads that have Cam staying when every other thread about Cam, and there are many of them, have Cam going away.

We need to talk...

It’s not Cam, it’s you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...