Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Long-time, Hurney hater here. but...


MHS831

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Based on early good feelings after the Draft? Every fanbase in the league thinks they hit their draft out of the park on an annual basis.

Plenty of people had good feelings about the drafting of Everette Brown and Armanti Edwards too.

Yes, but we are going to have to make decision now- we can't wait for these kids to bust or boom--I cover that point in my post--Rhule said he'd pick Marty as his GM 10 out of 10 times.  You are the owner that just gave him a 7-year contract.  You let Hurney go now?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I could live with assigning him to a lesser role, but I'm not sure Marty would be agreeable. Per his own statements, he likes being in charge of the whole thing.

That may be the reason behind Tepper's odd prior statements that he'd "hate to lose him". He might want Marty to take a different job but Marty may not agree with being demoted.

That is probably what will happen--but some want Hurney gone--I did---he then heads a draft that is widely popular and has the new coach's support....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Yes, but we are going to have to make decision now- we can't wait for these kids to bust or boom--I cover that point in my post--Rhule said he'd pick Marty as his GM 10 out of 10 times.  You are the owner that just gave him a 7-year contract.  You let Hurney go now?

Given that I've already basically stated that the full GM role is too big for Marty, yes I do.

Rhule has also said he doesn't like firing people. If one of his coordinators turns out to be terrible, are we going to keep them in place just to make Rhule happy also?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

That is probably what will happen--but some want Hurney gone--I did---he then heads a draft that is widely popular and has the new coach's support....

At what point did popularity with the fans less than a week out become a good standard by which to measure a draft?

And let's be real: We don't actually even know if Matt Rhule is going to be any good at his own job yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney did a great job with the draft and it doesn't take 3 years to figure that out. We all agree his win- loss record sucks since he came back but all these other things he supposedly sucks like contracts I haven't seen since he came back. For example the contract with CMC was pretty reasonable given his value to this team. I understand the dislike from Hurney 1.0 but the failure of folks to show adaptation and change around here is pretty amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Given that I've already basically stated that the full GM role is too big for Marty, yes I do.

Rhule has also said he doesn't like firing people. If one of his coordinators turns out to be terrible, are we going to keep them in place just to make Rhule happy also?

That might make sense if he was expected to do the whole role. But we are bringing in folks to help him and that is what should have happened under tight wad Richardson. Tepper wants collaboration and working together which is one of Hurney's strengths.

And if one of Rhule's ' coordinators turns out to be terrible it will be up to Rhule to fix it or move on. I thought you said head coaches control the coaches. Why would we make the decision? Isn't it his??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the coach we have on a 7 year deal should have a lot of say in whether we keep Marty or not, that’s really what it boils down to.

can Marty get Rhule and others the pieces they need to be a Super Bowl champ and consistent winner? 

I’ve seen far more talented rosters we’ve fielded go to waste because of Inept coaching more than roster depletion causing an issue. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

That might make sense if he was expected to do the whole role. But we are bringing in folks to help him and that is what should have happened under tight was Richardson. Tepper wants collaboration and working together which is one of Hurney's strengths.

And if one of Hurney's coordinators turns out to be terrible it will be up to Rhule tobfix it or move on. I thought you said head coaches control the coaches. Why would we make the decision? Isn't it his??

He already had folks to help him. We just changed who they were (Rob Rogers to Samir Sulieman, for example).

What Tepper has been talking about is basically a split GM system, but the understanding among pretty much everybody is that it's really just on the job training for Marty's replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

He already had folks to help him. We just changed who they were (Rob Rogers to Samir Sulieman, for example).

What Tepper has been talking about is basically a split GM system, but the understanding among pretty much everybody is that it's really just on the job training for Marty's replacement.

Did we have a capologist? No. 

And Hurney would agree that he would be glad to train his replacement. He is well into his sixties and isn't going to do this forever. That was the original plan when he came in 2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...