Joe Brady, “I believe Teddy is a Franchise QB.”

[Breakpoint4510]

1 minute ago, KSpan said:

Yes, I have and yes, the observation stands.

You seem to mistake someone else's opinion as your observation.  

[KSpan]

1 minute ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

You seem to mistake someone else's opinion as your observation.  

So my own opinion that I've stated for months now, and even years before in separate discussions, is somehow not actually my own.

Mm'kay.

[Breakpoint4510]

9 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Stop being so obtuse. Did you not see his dime to Moore? That’s a throw that Teddy cannot make. He won’t make it in year 4 when he’s 33 either.

Being a fan doesn’t mean you have to blindly believe in every player as if Teddy’s the best QB in the league. I need to stop posting, I feel the dumb creeping up on me.

You're the one who's leaving when Teddy extends. Apparently to you being a fan means that you get to lie about players you don't like. When you do stop posting it will be an addition by subtraction.

[Breakpoint4510]

10 minutes ago, KSpan said:

So my own opinion that I've stated for months now, and even years before in separate discussions, is somehow not actually my own.

Mm'kay.

You repeated what is called conventional wisdom. They are sayings that have been around forever that fit a multitude of circumstances. Some people actually think that they thought those sayings up all by them selves, while they actually are one step above plagiarists.

[Varking]

1 hour ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Those are effective numbers, and I'll stop when you stop.

I’m seeing some signs that say we don’t need Two-Contract Teddy. 

[stbugs]

Just now, Varking said:

I’m seeing some signs that say we don’t need Two-Contract Teddy. 

PJ’s at 75%. Should we extend him too?

[Breakpoint4510]

56 minutes ago, Varking said:

You look silly when saying signs are there he’s getting a second contract when he is half way through the first year of this first contract. I’d put money on nobody reaching out to him yet about an extension or new contract. It would be stupid business. He couldn’t even make it through one yeah without getting hurt. 

Not as silly as you look trying to hold Teddy's injury against him.  The absence of extension talks ten games into a three year deal is not evidence of anything.

[Breakpoint4510]

Just now, stbugs said:

PJ’s at 75%. Should we extend him too?

Try to stay focused.

[Varking]

1 minute ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Not as silly as you look trying to hold Teddy's injury against him.  The absence of extension talks ten games into a three year deal is not evidence of anything.

You have provided no evidence of anything related to a second contract. You said he’s completing passes which means signs are there according to you. 1-0 without Teddy.

And you don’t extend injury prone players. 

[Varking]

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

PJ’s at 75%. Should we extend him too?

Signs are there after the second drive he was on his way to an extension. 

[Breakpoint4510]

3 minutes ago, Varking said:

I’m seeing some signs that say we don’t need Two-Contract Teddy. 

That sounds like a you problem, not a we problem.

[Varking]

Just now, Breakpoint4510 said:

That sounds like a you problem, not a we problem.

There is no “we” when it comes to you. Thinking is your problem. 

[Breakpoint4510]

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

There is no “we” when it comes to you. Thinking is your problem. 

You're the one who thinks you know what "we" need. Seems like you're the one who has the problem thinking.

[Varking]

Just now, Breakpoint4510 said:

You're the one who thinks you know what "we" need. Seems like you're the one who has the problem thinking.

We don’t need to extend Teddy. What a horrible take. Trying to pretend like you’re some seer who tripped on rocks today and determined that means Teddy has a rock solid chance at another contract with us. Signs. Lmao