Could the top of the draft be flipped?

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, Varking said:

And Lance is a one year wonder playing on by far the best team in the subdivision. Nothing you have written has changed any of the truths I have also written. His team went out of their way in the championship game to limit his throwing and in his one game this year they absolutely should have done the same because it was a horrific showing. 

Horrific? LMAO! You haven't written any truths, just opinion. The truth is, Lance won his game! Wilson did not, and didn't look necessarily great himself.

[top dawg]

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Who is the flavor of the month? Fields was the presumed #2 overall pick coming into this season. Lance was also assumed to be a 1st rounder. Wilson has been the fast riser, but that goes back to late October/early November. There hasn't been any late risers.

Lance and Wilson are essentially one-year wonders! Due to circumstances really beyond his control, Lance had to chill while Wilson played. It's no wonder that Wilson has gotten the most positive press as of late. That being said, he's an intriguing prospect but is not a slam dunk to be drafted higher, much less actually turn out to be the better pro QB like some in the Huddle are assuming.

[LinvilleGorge]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Lance and Wilson are essentially one-year wonders! Due to circumstances really beyond his control, Lance had to chill while Wilson played. It's no wonder that Wilson has gotten the most positive press as of late. That being said, he's an intriguing prospect but is not a slam dunk to be drafted higher, much less actually turn out to be the better pro QB like some in the Huddle are assuming.

So, you like Lance and Wilson's hype causes you butthurt? Hell, if you want Lance, you should be loving the Wilson hype. Lawrence and Fields are almost certainly out of reach. Unless we trade up, we very well may be looking at drafting the 4th QB off the board so if you want Lance you better be hoping Wilson goes earlier.

[Moo Daeng]

Lance is a big reach in the first. He's interesting but come back to earth.

[Varking]

12 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Horrific? LMAO! You haven't written any truths, just opinion. The truth is, Lance won his game! Wilson did not, and didn't look necessarily great himself.

He was horrific. 15 of 30 for 150ish yards, 2 TDs and an INT throwing the ball? That is horrific. You aren’t being critical. You are being blinded by your fandom to a player. 
 

 

[top dawg]

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So, you like Lance and Wilson's hype causes you butthurt? Hell, if you want Lance, you should be loving the Wilson hype. Lawrence and Fields are almost certainly out of reach. Unless we trade up, we very well may be looking at drafting the 4th QB off the board so if you want Lance you better be hoping Wilson goes earlier.

LOL. I'm not butthurt about anything Are you mad? I'm just stating the obvious. I will be OK with the pick, whoever it is because I trust that Rhule knows what he's doing. If we pick Wilson over Lance, I'm not gonna cry about it. But when Lance turns out to be a good QB (with a high likelihood of being better than Wilson), I don't want to hear poo from you guys!

[LinvilleGorge]

Just now, top dawg said:

LOL. I'm not butthurt about anything Are you mad? I'm just stating the obvious. I will be OK with the pick, whoever it is because I trust that Rhule knows what he's doing. If we pick Wilson over Lance, I'm not gonna cry about it. But when Lance turns out to be a good QB (with a high likelihood of being better than Wilson), I don't want to hear poo from you guys!

What is the obvious?

[Varking]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

LOL. I'm not butthurt about anything Are you mad? I'm just stating the obvious. I will be OK with the pick, whoever it is because I trust that Rhule knows what he's doing. If we pick Wilson over Lance, I'm not gonna cry about it. But when Lance turns out to be a good QB (with a high likelihood of being better than Wilson), I don't want to hear poo from you guys!

You are definitely coming across as upset and hurt because others point out flaws with the guy you want. 

[top dawg]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

What is the obvious?

That Wilson is being talked about more than Lance right now because he played and Lance didn't. Simple as that!

[top dawg]

Just now, Varking said:

You are definitely coming across as upset and hurt because others point out flaws with the guy you want. 

Bullshit! That's what you want to make it about. 

[Varking]

Just now, top dawg said:

That Wilson is being talked about more than Lance right now because he played and Lance didn't. Simple as that!

Lance did play. Watching him throw the ball was hideous. 

[Varking]

Just now, top dawg said:

Bullshit! That's what you want to make it about. 

See this? This is what was being pointed out. This is butthurt. Relax. 

[LinvilleGorge]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

That Wilson is being talked about more than Lance right now because he played and Lance didn't. Simple as that!

Had Lance lit it up like expected in his one and only game he wouldn't have had a giant bucket of ice water dumped on his hype train. It isn't just because Wilson has played well, it's also that Lance didn't play particularly well in his one and only appearance.

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, Varking said:

You are definitely coming across as upset and hurt because others point out flaws with the guy you want. 

Other than being an inexperienced college QB that needs to be coached up, like all of them,  Lance's biggest "flaw" is his level of competition! Anyone paying attention knows that.