Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

According to this analytics chart, these are the top drafting teams of the last 10 years

blueandblackattack

By blueandblackattack,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

blueandblackattack Community Regular

blueandblackattack

Posted
Posted

Given that in the "Peters is out - GM search down to 3 candidates" post there seemed to be a lot of speculation as to how bad teams have drafted that these candidates are coming from.

I mostly assumed the same thing about the Seahawks and Patriots, but after a quick Google search to see if anyones crunched the data, I found a reliable source:

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2020/nfl-drafting-efficiency-2010-2019

They break it down pretty seamlessly for each chart. Starting off with who had the best draft capital (using the Chase Stewart draft value chart), then by draft returns (which teams have picked the best players consistently, regardless of draft position), and finally combining both to see which teams make the most out of each pick.

I recommend checking it out for yourself.

 

But for the TL;DR crowd:

Seahawks - Fitterer - 1ST in draft efficiency in the last 10 years, 10TH in the last 5

Patriots - Ossenfort - 8TH in draft efficiency the last 10 years, 15TH in the last 5

Chiefs - Poles - 7TH in draft efficiency the last 10 years, 1ST in the last 5

49ers - Peters - 23RD in draft efficiency the last 10 years, 18TH in the last 5 (just one spot above the Panthers)

 

Based on the data alone, looks like we should be going after Ryan Poles 1st, Fitterer 2nd and Ossenfort 3rd.

But who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Saw Jason Lacanfora tweet at someone that you should follow the money, Fitterer has the same agent as Rhule. Take it for what it's worth. Personally I don't care who it is, I just want to see this org take a step forward.

It's not gonna be Marty.

Whatever else there may be, there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Yup, seeing as Peters is "out", it's more than likely going to be Scott, Mr. Scot.

Very possible.

David Newton thinks we might hear the answer later today. Pretty much everyone thinks it'll be tomorrow at the latest, maybe tomorrow morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

It just goes to show that what fans think is mostly based on limited, somewhat superficial information (not saying that this particular metric is the be-all-end-all).

We should respect the work of the professionals--those whose business is to know certain things, those with more access, and those in the know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, top dawg said:

It just goes to show that what fans think is mostly based on limited, somewhat superficial information (not saying that this particular metric is the be-all-end-all).

We should respect the work of the professionals--those whose business is to know certain things, those with more access, and those in the know.

Relatively speaking...

I remember people used to say 'well, Marty Hurney is a professional GM" and he was, but relative to the other professional GMs in the NFL, he wasn't very good.

Likewise, Jimmy Clausen is certainly a better quarterback than any of us will ever be, just not good enough to play in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • frankw
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By frankw · Posted

      The huddle has long discussed our propensity for overvaluing RAS over skill and that continued after Fitterer's exit. Anyone that has concerns about drafting for measurables in this particular instance needs to speak with Dan Morgan and Craig Young. In terms of Legette I feel most people expected and were willing to give him time based on his one season of production. But the social media schmoozing the lazy route running the lack of basic focus on bringing down passes the poor decision making all around getting himself ejected in that preseason game last year etc. These issues that are hindering him from having even a basic significance to the offense level of impact can largely be corrected by him very quickly if he puts his head on straight and commits to his career.
    • Chaos
      Greg beats Brady for Sportscasting Emmy

      By Chaos · Posted

      Well deserved, Greg is just more likeable and has charisma in the booth.  I'm not a fan of TB on the mic.
    • Chaos
      EVERYONE UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS IN YOUR PROFILE

      By Chaos · Posted

      Just to clarify, is the request to update email address only if we need it to be a different one than what we signed up with, or does everyone need to do the update exercise even if our email isn't changing?  My account is currently tied to my correct Gmail address, so I'm good with it as it is.  I don't know if there is a way to test that my currently linked email will send out a notification.
×
×
  • Create New...