Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Todd McShay is CONVINCED we will move on from Teddy


JABANOG
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I believe you're thinking of Evan Cooper.

Was it Cooper? Someone asked the question with thinking Joe Brady was going to get mentioned and Rhule came with a cruve. I think it was still Nixon, hes offense too. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Maybe it was, my memory is not reliable. Not going to dig all Rhules' pressers to find out.  

You don't have to. It wasn't a presser. It was a conference call. Specifically, the one prior to our first game against the Saints.

On the call, Rhule mentioned Cooper talking about Bridgewater and suggesting he'd fit well into our offense. Igo posted about it after it happened.

Of course, at that point in the season, feelings about Bridgewater were a lot more positive than they would be later on.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

CMC, Roddy ANderson, DJ Moore are not chopped liver. A couple of them could be HOFers. So if Teddy stays(unlikely)- will he have less, more, or the same numbers/impact? His first year staring since 2015(?), Brady first time installing O, new to queen, lost CMC early, no TE, no OTAs, no training camp, no off-season group trips, played hurt after TB, convid BS, etc etc. People have been far too hard on him. I believe, given ALL that listed, he could improve some. Thats my hope too, since we're on the hook for part of his salary. People act like he was the worst QB in NFL history, he played average and got a average check. Its not a win or lost. He set career highs with all of that too. 

Lol. You Teddy stans just won’t go away. He is a mediocre QB who will NEVER improve. I cannot wait for that hack to be gone. Never have I disliked a player on our team like Teddy Trashwater. It is almost all because of you annoying Teddy fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Lol. You Teddy stans just won’t go away. He is a mediocre QB who will NEVER improve. I cannot wait for that hack to be gone. Never have I disliked a player on our team like Teddy Trashwater. It is almost all because of you annoying Teddy fans. 

No fan(stated that numerous times), just Im able to see and understand the bigger picture. Plus I dont judge any free agent in the first season(same for rookies), much less the all the facts I listed above. But haters going to hate or in your case bitches going to bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You don't have to. It wasn't a presser. It was a conference call. Specifically, the one prior to our first game against the Saints.

On the call, Rhule mentioned Cooper talking about Bridgewater and suggesting he'd fit well into our offense. Igo posted about it after it happened.

Of course, at that point in the season, feelings about Bridgewater were a lot more positive than they would be later on.

You described it how I remembered, I think it was Cooper now. That was the beginning of the Teddy hate train, I thought for sure he was to say Joe Brady. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how probable it is, but a reverse effect might be possible.

The Lions staff headed by Dan Campbell is obviously going to have some Saints influence. If Campbell remembers Bridgewater positively, maybe there's a chance we can offload him there to backup whoever they get. Could conceivably be part of a deal to get Stafford.

The Chargers could be another possibility. They hired former Saints QB Coach Joe Lombardi as their OC. He might think Bridgewater could be a capable backup to Herbert.

Mind you, I'd say in either of those places or anywhere else he goes, he's going to need to renegotiate his contract and be willing to accept a backup role.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...