Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nfl.com mock


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, saX man said:

They're doing that thing where they hype up the other top talent at the same position and wanting clicks/to be cute. 

I see the peaches between the leaches.

I think it's also they are actually hearing from scouts that don't consider him to be as surefire of a pick as other scouts do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DeSim said:

I don't think it's to be cute, I think these draft insiders might actually be getting these opinions (Rashawn Slater being better than Penei) from actual people in front offices around the NFL, they (front office people) throw it out there knowing it's completely false hoping it lets Penei Sewell to drop to them, if some other team bites on the hype and selects Slater first.  Even though is obvious to many that Penei is the better talent, teams still attempt that strategy hoping it works, doesn't hurt to try.  Happens for many other players as well.

bruh,

teams spend a lot of money and time doing their own evaluations. what other teams say isn't going to affect their own evaluations/scouting. 

panthers will have their own big board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stbugs said:

I don’t get this thinking since Lance won’t be available late first. Jones and Mond aren’t going to be good QBs in the NFL. Mond  looked awful at times in the Senior Bowl. Having a good LT is meaningless if we have another Teddy or worse. Maybe we take Sewell if we don’t like the QBs at 8, but trading up for Jones or wasting a day 2 pick on Mond is a terrible idea. If we get our future QB at 8, we can draft 2-3 more OL and more in 2022 and have a really solid OL when they are ready and let Teddy get clobbered this year.

you nor anyone can say for certain how any player much less QB will turn out. 

Lawrence could be a total bust while Jones could end up in the hall of fame. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

bruh,

teams spend a lot of money and time doing their own evaluations. what other teams say isn't going to affect their own evaluations/scouting. 

panthers will have their own big board. 

You’d be surprised, constantly hearing a different opinion by many people can make someone have second thoughts and question themselves.  It might not always work or no one might bite but like I said, it does not hurt to try.  It’s a strategy that has been mentioned in the past by people in front offices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DeSim said:

You’d be surprised, constantly hearing a different opinion by many people can make someone have second thoughts and question themselves.  It might not always work or no one might bite but like I said, it does not hurt to try.  It’s a strategy that has been mentioned in the past by people in front offices. 

they mention those things not to alter another teams evals/scouting reports but to make them think another team might value or not value a player which can influence trades. 

its not to alter another teams evals/scouting reports. those will remain constant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...