Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sewell


bythenbrs
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If you go strictly by the you don't draft *insert position* from *insert college program*, then Brian Burns isn't a Panther because lord knows there's no shortage of NFL bust pass rushers from FSU.

I think you do have to pay attention to those things because generally there's a reason (like with Alabama quarterbacks for example).

But you also have to be a good enough scout to know when those issues don't apply

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If you go strictly by the you don't draft *insert position* from *insert college program*, then Brian Burns isn't a Panther because lord knows there's no shortage of NFL bust pass rushers from FSU.

There are a lot of teams that wish they hadn't rolled their eyes at yet another Jeff Tedford Call QB when Aaron Rodgers was available.

You're right about Florida State pass rushers, but a bust on the D-line won't set you back like a bust at the QB position.

I won't tell you my exact age, but i'm old enough to remember the Bradshaw, Staubach, Stabler era of pro football. Tell me a an exceptional NFL QB out of Ohio State, Alabama, or Penn State since 1980. Outside of Carson Palmer give a good QB out of USC since 1980. If you take away Joe Montana (1979 draft), Notre Dame hasn't had a solid QB in the NFL since Joe Theisman and he played with the Redskins from the mid 70's thru the mid 80's.

You just can't ignore things like that if you plan on drafting your next "Franchise QB", especially if you're willing to give up a boat load of draft choices to get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

Considering we were willing to shop #8 and then some for Stafford, I think this regime will do all it can to trade up and draft the next face of the franchise. #3, or #5 since a trade with ATL at #4 is out of the question. 

I still can't see NYJ taking a QB at #2, Darnold was billed highly and NYJ has been a dumpster fire since he's been there from a coaching perspective, with some knock it out the prospects available if I'm the NYJ I'm inclined to pick a stud (Sewell / Smith / Chase), or trade back and accumulate more picks inside the top 10-15 if a partner is available since they have a franchise capable yet to be proven QB on the roster with three years left at rookie pay. 

 

Stafford is a guaranteed elite QB with 4+ years left. You're improving the short term without sacrificing the long term.

Any trade up for a QB sacrifices your ability to surround him with elite talent (unless Fitterer is an exceptional drafter). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I picked up too turdpiles from the same poster for saying basically I liked both Jake and Cam.  I tried to find where I had been negative and couldn’t see it. It was basically my most ‘fan’ posting in months, I thought. Innocuous approval of the guys behind our two best years. Could not make sense of it other to think that it was not okay with someone that I like both QBs. 
    • They are not equal. But I didn’t believe either was worth that ridiculously desperate trade up.  I agreed with you then and still believe that now. We got horrible value for those assets.    Half the people here trashed the 2023 offense while overlooking that a coach they don’t think much of went 6-6 with them to finish 2022. You could have built on that.   Think about the picks lost and DJ too, and the additional investment in 2024 and the 1st this year and imagine all that still being done and having Darnold running it.  Then the 9th in 2023, the other 1st and two 2nds, you could have put them into the defense and still have had the massive offensive investment. Granted you would have altered the cap money you had for the guards by paying Darnold.  And tell me we wouldn’t have been so far ahead of where we are now….
×
×
  • Create New...