Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Three quarterbacks in the top four picks?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, 45catfan said:

We won't have to.  All 4 QBs going before pick 5 is so highly improbable that isn't not worth fretting over.  No reason to be all nervous to jump to #3.  The 5th pick is only 300 points on a trade value chart from #8.  Even for QB inflation, you are not talking about much more.  We sit tight if we think one falls or move to up to #5.  Watson will cost us A TON MORE than moving up to #5.

Everything really hinges on the Jets and do they take Wilson. If they go with Sewell, Cincinnati is more likely to trade back since their elite LT is off the board. Sewell and Bechton on the edges with Darnold and no Gase might be interesting. It Darnold does suck, they would be in good position to go after Howell next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Everything really hinges on the Jets and do they take Wilson. If they go with Sewell, Cincinnati is more likely to trade back since their elite LT is off the board. Sewell and Bechton on the edges with Darnold and no Gase might be interesting. It Darnold does suck, they would be in good position to go after Howell next year. 

Sewell and Slater won't both be gone before #5 and the next couple of teams are looking at defense or skill positions.  Cincy can move back and still either get Sewell, Slater or possibly the choice of the two.  They are in a cherry spot at #5.  I don't think it would take much to move them back 3 spots to #8.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Sewell and Slater won't both be gone before #5 and the next couple of teams are looking at defense or skill positions.  Cincy can move back and still either get Sewell, Slater or possibly the choice of the two.  They are in a cherry spot at #5.  I don't think it would take much to move them back 3 spots to #8.  

Agree that they both won’t be gone but Slater doesn’t quite have the length. He makes it up in footwork, no doubt, and I’m a footwork guy. I just don’t  know if he warrants taking at 5 with that. Now if we traded up to 5 and he was there at 8, I could totally understand it. You’ve grabbed a couple extra picks which makes kicking him inside if you have to a little more palatable. If the Jets take Sewell, I see Cincy moving. If not, I think they stay put. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm super excited about the guys we're getting back, and fortunately this year, outside of Robert Hunt, we haven't had any season-threatening injuries. Rico has earned the start, but I am excited to have both available.  The team is finally turning into the run-first team Canales said he wanted to be. As for JT Sanders, I think he has lost the most be being out. He is probably our best receiving TE, but with the emergence of Mitchell Evans & with him and Tommy Tremble both absolutely balling in run blocking, it will be hard to fix something that isn't broken. I'm hoping Turk Wharton can help with our pass rush. We really havent gotten to see him much due to injuries, but we desperately need anyone to provide some pass rush juice, which is what he was brought to do. I'm the most excited about Jalen Coker returning. Theilen may have been the most clutch last year, but I've watched a lot of film, and Coker was the most consistent WR we had when he was out there last year.  I think he can be an ideal #2 to Tmac. While Coker doesn't have the raw athleticism XL does, his route running, savvy, and overall football IQ simply make him better.  I think with the fact Coker can play both outside and in the slot will give our pass game more versatility.  We have been running a lot of 2 TE sets, and I think Tmac & Coker should be the primary WRs for 12 personnel. The other WRs (XL, Tremayne, Renfrow, & Horn) all have roles, but I dont think any of them can fully replace what Coker can do. I do think Renfrow will be inactive this week if everyone is healthy bc of how valuable Tremayne is for ST and as a run blocker. So happy that we are playing meaningful football heading into November. We are still almost certainly a year away, but we are absolutely moving in the right direction     
    • Better than a fragile starter, though 
×
×
  • Create New...