Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HOF QB’s equals Super Bowls?


Dog Runner
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, weyco2000 said:

Brady’s 7 as a sixth rounder sorta makes his point 

 

 

 

That’s entirely irrelevant to the point. The post had nothing to do with draft position. He was arguing that having a HOF QB isn’t that important to Super Bowls. The fact that the vast majority of Super Bowls in the past 20 years were won by HOF QBs destroys the point. The only non HOF winners I can think of are Eli, Flacco and  Foles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are three things super bowl contenders have in common since Panthers inception...in order (season stats, not post season)

1. Top defense

2. Top oline

3. Top qb

There are anomalies but what’s also interesting are QB stats from Super Bowls/playoffs. For the most part they’re atrocious. Perhaps because in these games both teams ‘play smart’ for the majority of the game.

The only success if 1 and 2 are missing is a HOF qb.

Brady skews a lot of these points but, usually 1 or 2 is a year by year thing. So 3 offers consistency. There is a reason it’s the ‘85 Bears or 00’ Ravens or 19’ 49ers. They simply don’t last. They’re harder to put together.

So while 1 and 2 are more in common, 3 has has the chance of consistency.

1 and 2 involve 17 players, not one. However, if you can put together a top defense and top oline you will be a contender even with average QB play. Numerous examples.

Great QB play and poor defense and oline will never make you competitive. It just doesn’t happen, there are no examples.

HOF does not equal Super Bowls. It’s just much much easier to do it with one.

A top defense is what equals Super Bowls. There is just absolutely no way around that. And oline. Both more than QB.

There are only 3-4 examples of a poor defense going to the SB and all examples include a HOF QB or Eli Manning going super sayan on the pats OR the defense someone became elite in the post season after being trash in the regular season.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Dog Runner said:

QB - The most important position in Football ?

HOF QB’s and SB appearances (some future)

Aaron Rodgers - 1 SB in 15 years

 Drew Brees - 1 SB in 19 years

Matt Ryan -1 SB in 13 years

Cam Newton - 1 SB in 10 years

Dan Marino - 1 SB in 17 years

Phillip Rivers - 0 SB in 16 years

Andrew Luck - 0 SB in 8 years

Brett Favre - 2 SB in 19 years

Russell Wilson - 2 SB in 11 years

Lots of HOF QB’s with small amount of SB appearances.  We can’t trade away the store    to get a qb.  A  HOF QB doesn’t guarantee success.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tom Brady skews that number to start with 

4 of those QBs are questionable for the HOF 

If you meant first rd, different story but Brady skews that as well 

the fact is the number of Bradysand Russell Wilsons are rare 

Brees was a second rd 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Down to Carolina and Washington for Ehlers. 
    • Who are your top three breakout candidates for next season?    My three: Jatavion Sanders- Simply put he is the best receiving TE we have had since Olsen. We all saw his potential over that three game stretch prior to his neck injury where he showed a real connection with Bryce. Good route runner with glue for hands, limited blocking upside but he gives solid effort. With Tremble already being hurt I don’t see a reason why he already isn’t our starter and clear future at TE. Trevin Wallace- For a developmental LB forced into a starting role last year he  exceeded expectations. LB is one of the hardest positions to adjust to from college, and for a prospect who was widely regarded as very raw, surprisingly he was solid in coverage and only had an 11.9% missed tackle rate. He was overly aggressive consistently, and needs to work on his play recognition. But he is set up to be our best LB next season, and likely starter for years ahead. Even barring reaching his upside, his floor was clearly a lot higher than draft pundits assumed(Morgan can scout LBS). Cade Mayes- I am hopeful Cade wins the starting job at C this season. He may have been our most improved player last season, he looked like an above average starting C after he took over for an injured Corbett. He allowed 0 sacks on 327 pass block snaps. Corbett can not stay healthy, and at this stage in his career Mayes is objectively the better player. Mayes is only 26 and gives us the potential of stability at C, something we have never had since Ryan Kalil retired. Corbett slots in as a great backup C/Guard, and Cade continues to develop and gain more chemistry with Bryce and our stud duo of Hunt/Lewis.
    • Have to pair them like this for it to work, imo. Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Walker Ghosty - Chatfield    I'd prefer something different but that's probably what we end up with unless Ghost is traded to one of the 17 teams not on his MNTC. 
×
×
  • Create New...