Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HOF QB’s equals Super Bowls?


Dog Runner
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, weyco2000 said:

Brady’s 7 as a sixth rounder sorta makes his point 

 

 

 

That’s entirely irrelevant to the point. The post had nothing to do with draft position. He was arguing that having a HOF QB isn’t that important to Super Bowls. The fact that the vast majority of Super Bowls in the past 20 years were won by HOF QBs destroys the point. The only non HOF winners I can think of are Eli, Flacco and  Foles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are three things super bowl contenders have in common since Panthers inception...in order (season stats, not post season)

1. Top defense

2. Top oline

3. Top qb

There are anomalies but what’s also interesting are QB stats from Super Bowls/playoffs. For the most part they’re atrocious. Perhaps because in these games both teams ‘play smart’ for the majority of the game.

The only success if 1 and 2 are missing is a HOF qb.

Brady skews a lot of these points but, usually 1 or 2 is a year by year thing. So 3 offers consistency. There is a reason it’s the ‘85 Bears or 00’ Ravens or 19’ 49ers. They simply don’t last. They’re harder to put together.

So while 1 and 2 are more in common, 3 has has the chance of consistency.

1 and 2 involve 17 players, not one. However, if you can put together a top defense and top oline you will be a contender even with average QB play. Numerous examples.

Great QB play and poor defense and oline will never make you competitive. It just doesn’t happen, there are no examples.

HOF does not equal Super Bowls. It’s just much much easier to do it with one.

A top defense is what equals Super Bowls. There is just absolutely no way around that. And oline. Both more than QB.

There are only 3-4 examples of a poor defense going to the SB and all examples include a HOF QB or Eli Manning going super sayan on the pats OR the defense someone became elite in the post season after being trash in the regular season.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Dog Runner said:

QB - The most important position in Football ?

HOF QB’s and SB appearances (some future)

Aaron Rodgers - 1 SB in 15 years

 Drew Brees - 1 SB in 19 years

Matt Ryan -1 SB in 13 years

Cam Newton - 1 SB in 10 years

Dan Marino - 1 SB in 17 years

Phillip Rivers - 0 SB in 16 years

Andrew Luck - 0 SB in 8 years

Brett Favre - 2 SB in 19 years

Russell Wilson - 2 SB in 11 years

Lots of HOF QB’s with small amount of SB appearances.  We can’t trade away the store    to get a qb.  A  HOF QB doesn’t guarantee success.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tom Brady skews that number to start with 

4 of those QBs are questionable for the HOF 

If you meant first rd, different story but Brady skews that as well 

the fact is the number of Bradysand Russell Wilsons are rare 

Brees was a second rd 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Those were the days lol 
    • Have you even been reading my posts?  I'm not so sure because you seem to insinuate that I'm expecting some monster year 1 season, but I've time and time again said I'm only expecting 800 yards from him as a rookie.  Because like you said, it's not in his control, we have a bunch of good receiving options and two 1k yard RBs in what should be a run first offense. And yes, I'm very much a T-Mac homer, I've never once denied it, I'm an Arizona alumni who has been open about that from the very first thread I made about him over 18 months ago. But that doesn't mean I'm blindly expecting him to be an All Pro as a rookie, I just know more about his game than most people here who watch his highlights and breakdowns.  Which generally focus on the things he does best and worst to highlight his best abilities (his downfield contested catches) and where he needs to improve (separation) as those are the two things fans care most about when talking about the draft. What those breakdowns don't cover much are the "boring and mundane" things he does very well and exactly what you are talking about needing for Bryce.   He was constantly used in the short passing game, whether they be WR screens or quick slants, to get the ball in his hands and let him make plays, it's why he was 5th in the Big 12 in YAC last year.  With his size and hands, when he runs a quick 5 yard slant in front of the defender and the QB delivers the ball on time with anticipation, creating buckets of separation isn't needed, he's going to make the catch and then get some YAC for a 1st down.  Go watch the 30 minute YT videos that string together every catch he made last year (or the same thing from 2023) and you'll see those plays constantly, but in the analyst breakdowns leading into the draft those things don't get discussed as much as the big plays and then the things he needs to work on, because they're just not as "sexy" to talk about as those. Per your ask... He has 3 main things he needs to improve upon, and again, "needing to improve" doesn't mean "he's terrible" at them, just things he can get better at, like all young players have things to work on. 1.  His get off at the snap.   For all the amazing things he did for us at Arizona, this was always the thing that would frustrate me the most, as he generally was a bit slow to fire off the line.  The nice thing is even in the minimal clips we've seen from rookie mini camp, his initial fire off the line already appears to have been sped up a lot, he clearly has been working on that in the lead up to the draft. 2.  His separation Yea, he's not a 6' quick twitch athlete, so his separation is never going to be at the level of a Chase or Jefferson.  I've always admitted that, but because he's not one of those guys, he also brings a lot of things that those others can't.  His catch radius and hands are why I'm not as concerned about his separation, because he's so good at making those contested catches by snatching the ball away from his body to where the defender can't get to it to break it up. But yes, he does still need to get better here, just as all rookies have things to improve upon. 3.  Using his body more physically This is something that he did at times, but he also is just a great athlete for his size and would often rely on his physical abilities to make defenders miss him in the open field than just power through them, which is fine in college.  But yes, at the next level, as he gets older and stronger, I'd like to see him use it more like Evans does, and that will come with time as he builds strength and develops that part of his game. Again, I implore you to to spend an hour watching those "Every catch from the X season" for his last two years in college.  If/when you do, I think you're going to be very surprised by the number of times we used him in the short passing game and let him gain YAC to move the ball down the field.
×
×
  • Create New...