Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

North Carolina head coach Roy Williams announces retirement


Mother Grabber
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Cookie Lyon said:

So awkward.

Why did he feel the need to even mention his wife in response to that question?

Really?  He did that because maybe he doesn't want to be defined by how much melanin he has or the lack of how much his wife has.  I'd like to hear/see the exact question posed to him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cookie Lyon said:

Where in my post did I make any of those insane assumptions that you just came up with?

The question he was asked had NOTHING to do with his wife. 

Try to keep up. 

My point is, if you THINK about it, you'll realize why he brought her up. It's not that difficult to grasp. He answered the question they asked, and added something to it.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that people are upset about this is ridiculous. So you can be proud to be a black coach but you can’t be proud to be white or have a white wife? I thought we were all supposed to be equal so why does it even matter that he is the first black coach at UNC? That matters just as much as how tall he is. Imagine the headline reading “first 7ft tall coach in history”. He is clearly clowning all you race baiting snow flakes. He doesn’t care that he is the first black coach and neither should anyone else. He should care that they thought he was the best person for the job and now gets to lead one of the most historic programs. People say that him bringing up the fact he has a white wife was not needed. Well neither is bringing up his race as a coach. How does that make him a better or worse coach? You all preach equality but shove in the face of everyone the opposite. The only thing that matters is winning. You don’t win then you get fired. Simple as that. Nothing to do with race. If he wins then he keeps his job and gives redemption to UNC. You people who have a problem with him bringing up his wife should be embarrassed of yourselves. You can be proud of being white just like you can be proud of being black. Stop shaming white people for being white. They were born that way. They have no choice what color they are born. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Whatev said:

Really?  He did that because maybe he doesn't want to be defined by how much melanin he has or the lack of how much his wife has.  I'd like to hear/see the exact question posed to him.  

Right? Imagine if he was a white coach with a black wife and brought her up. She would have been showered with praise and so would he have. They would have praised them for being so diverse and “progressive”. They treat minorities like they’re a trophy. It’s disgusting how you people are so quick to praise someone just for not being white. Who cares what color you are. Those people are more racist than anyone else for having that way of thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Cookie Lyon said:

Where in my post did I make any of those insane assumptions that you just came up with?

The question he was asked had NOTHING to do with his wife. 

Try to keep up. 

Being a black coach has nothing to do with basketball so what is your point? Does his skin color make any difference in his ability to coach a team? Don’t treat him like a trophy for being a black coach. That’s extremely racist and disgusting. This wouldn’t even be a story if his wife was black and he said he was proud to have a black wife. Whether you’re white, black or Asian you should be able to be proud of your race. White shaming is just as bad as shaming any other race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • a) That they made it a point in the room to point at the paper and say, "hope the camera got that" suggests we really did target the players we wanted and got them. While there is a ton of editing happening to cut out conversations not related to the players we picked, there didn't seem to be a lot of panic about who/what was going on b) Tepper appreciates the analytics. Now that he has a few years to see how the front office team works together to do the analysis, it still looks like he's hands-off (he's learned his lesson??). He seemed less vocal than in previous years' Blueprints (at least, in the edit).  I wouldn't expect Canales to be overly vocal in the draft room - he's likely already made his opinions known behind the scenes about certain players. Draft day is Morgan and Tilis and Eager's day. Loved seeing their interactions/conversations  c) that's all Eager. There's a great piece somewhere about the analytics engine he built floating around somewhere (maybe it was just after the draft?), and how he's constantly tweaking it with info about the players and input from the coaching staff.  That the post-draft press - for the most part - all seem to be overly positive about the draft actions we had compared to other teams makes it seem like we've gotten the ship moving in the right direction. Whether it translates to on-field results, well, that's a different topic for hundreds of other threads
    • I was wondering if they have made the decision to move him inside, to the other side (timing bad), or move on. They can wait to see his development before coming to that conclusion.  But to your point, with Walker on a one-year deal and the knowledge that Ickey should be back during the season, I was surprised that we seemed so focused on Freeling (in particular) and the LOT position in this draft. I don't think it was going to be "which one," but I think they were contemplating a trade up to get ahead of Detroit to take Freeling when they saw him there mid draft.  I dunno. They seemed to be targeting him--even to the point where they asked, "If Freeling is gone, what are you going to do?" So I think they are (at the very least) proceeding as if he is done, and that sure makes it seem as if they might be done with him.  Depth at OT:  We signed a starting LT (Walker) and we signed a veteran swing OT in Stone Forsythe.  Morgan says his knee is not a huge concern and talks of playing a few more years.  Ickey could return mid season, some say.  To see this clearly, you have to consider what Morgan said in the Blueprint video about how signing free agents helped in the draft.  They claimed that the OT draft class was strong.  It is my view that ILB and Edge were bigger needs, so by signing Phillips and Lloyd, we eliminated those needs so we could focus on LT in this draft.  They wanted Freeling, it seems, and that is not necessarily based on anything concerning Ickey's injury or recovery.  They see him as an upgrade.  They mentioned his athleticism and feel that he can protect Bryce better than Ickey did.   Does that mean Ickey is done?  Good question.  WHat do they know?
×
×
  • Create New...