Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Intrigued by Fields


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

https://www.espn.com/video/clip/_/id/30174871
 

Looks like Fields is vegan. Didn’t Cam start getting his injuries after he went vegetarian? Might be just a coincidence...

Cam got hurt and plenty dinged up even before he went vegan. He just played through most of his stuff like when he crashed his truck because he’s a tough dude. Eating meat isn’t going to help your shoulder feel better when TJ Watt bulldozes into your shoulder as you’re throwing a football. 
 

Fields got tackled weird and hurt his knee the previous year when he wasn’t vegan. He then came back to the field, scrambled with a brace on, rolled left and threw a dagger to the end zone to put a fork in Michigan. Fields gets his ribs jacked this year as a vegan and then goes back into the game and puts the best game of any QB this year in college together. 
 

I wouldn’t read too much into this. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Fields is there, I have zero problem if they take Fields at 8 if they truly  believe he is the guy or will be the guy  drafting in the top 10 again best not happen again   Since Rhule screwed the pooch on the QB lottery, he is where he is.

they covered their bets with Darnold 

Is the smart thing trade down, or take a cb or OT, probably but it’s poker, if you really believe in fields and he is there, you take him. Get your LT in the second and cb in third 

next year them, if Darnold is serviceable, you trade him.  Let someone else carry the 18 million.  If he is fabulous, you can trade fields   Somehow fabulous and darnold in the nfl don’t go together 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...