Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina not done in the first


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

How on earth are 2 later round picks going to prevent us from acquiring a franchise QB? And what has that have to do with "Mortgaging our future"?

 

We get it. Once again, the Panthers have broken your heart where it comes to QB. But let's not go overboard trying to make it worse than it actually is.

Actually read the post you're replying to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Actually read the post you're replying to.

 

Rhule has been here 2 years. 1 with Hurney. But by all means, hold what happened before he got here against him.

 

The roster as it sits, is better than it has been is a long time. And we still have 6 picks. But hey, Tepper. Right?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Rhule has been here 2 years. 1 with Hurney. But by all means, hold what happened before he got here against him.

 

The roster as it sits, is better than it has been is a long time. And we still have 6 picks. But hey, Tepper. Right?

 

 

That's the sound of moving goal posts. Guess it wasn't going your way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's the sound of moving goal posts. Guess it wasn't going your way.

 

Nice try. I have yet to change my stance. That your fixation with the QB position has clouded your judgement, and jaded your outlook.

 

By the way. I don't have to move the goalposts. You are a statue with your "We don't have a quality QB, so Tepper and his minions aren't looking good" speil. 

 

Rhule has been here 2 years. If you feel that is an adequate amount of time to start calling it a failed experiment. Then have at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many new coaches that come in to rebuild with no QB.... have done as little as Rhule in regards to a QB.   They generally have made a real investment (an attempt) for the future by year 2.  Rhule now on his second short term vet rental. 

it’s a unique plan to wait to year 3 or 4....to finally bring in QB talent to your rebuild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Nice try. I have yet to change my stance. That your fixation with the QB position has clouded your judgement, and jaded your outlook.

 

By the way. I don't have to move the goalposts. You are a statue with your "We don't have a quality QB, so Tepper and his minions aren't looking good" speil. 

 

Rhule has been here 2 years. If you feel that is an adequate amount of time to start calling it a failed experiment. Then have at it.

Yes, I've been consistent with my position. Do you actually understand why I'm saying we've mortgaged our future on Darnold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yes, I've been consistent with my position. Do you actually understand why I'm saying we've mortgaged our future on Darnold?

 

Cuz you ain't happy. And by God you want us all to know about it. You started with Teddy, and continue it with Sam. At least you are consistent.

 

Lot's of folks are not happy we have Sam. But no one but you thinks we "Mortgaged" our future. But hey. Like I said. Have at it.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

 

Cuz you ain't happy. And by God you want us all to know about it. You started with Teddy, and continue it with Sam. At least you are consistent.

 

Lot's of folks are not happy we have Sam. But no one but you thinks we "Mortgaged" our future. But hey. Like I said. Have at it.

 

 

 

 

So, that'd be a "no". Cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It's not sarcasm. I'm just not going to sit here and teach a class on opportunity cost.

 

Oh yeah, I forgot about that one. lol Because we ignored opportunity costs, we mortgaged our future. And if Rhule doesn't get his sh.. together, we are doomed. Am I right?

 

So tell me, how many years are we doomed to endure before we rise from the ashes of this debacle? Is it even possible to recover from this mess?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...