Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparing Current Roster Against 2003


jfra78
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

yep, Manning Jr also has a lot to do with my Horn hesitation going in.  Manning Jr only worked playing a certain way.  He couldn't adjust and find success playing different. 

 

It's a legitimate concern.  My hope is that Horn is a superior athlete and can use his speed to compensate for the difference in physicality.

Horn's only real knock I could find is that he is overly handsy with receivers... I hope with good coaching and having officials at training camp will help him find a happy medium...

That being said, we definitely need more aggression in our secondary overall, and hopefully having Horn and Chinn along with the other guys will turn this unit into a force that can actually cover the big-time receivers they will have to go against in the NFC South

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Bridgewater had 3700 yards and Delhome had 3200. Their difference wasn’t as much as the WR difference. The 2020 Panthers weren’t some sort of juggernaut passing team that rolled up stats. Considering Teddy’s check down and missing deep/ignoring wide open deep plays, it’s amazing to think that we had 3 WRs with over 1000 total yards a piece.

We are comparing the 2003 WRs to 2020/2021 WRs not what the WRs became. Again, Proehl did barely anything (22-23 yards a game), so it really was 2003 Smith and Muhammad against 2020/2021 Moore, Anderson and Samuel/Marshall-Moore-Smith (not sure who will be #3). We can only hope that Marshall becomes a stud and Darnold has no other recourse than to explode.

Honestly, we don’t know what the final careers of Moore, Anderson and Marshall will be but I’d put the 2020 WRs above the trio of 2003 WRs based on the results. Just one man’s opinion.

Well, it's just two totally different eras IMO of the passing offense.  The rules have dictated QBs and WRs have an easier time completing balls today.  That is a major factor in my positioning.   

and my preference for 2003 is heavily weighted on the 1 and 2 spots.  I just think 89 and Moose did some ridiculous stuff given the coverage and balls Jake threw. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I here you, just think we’ve got a very talented and hopefully not under appreciated anymore with Sam. Teddy’s results were far more based on what his WRs did for him than his throws. I still think Moore is tragically underrated and we may see that change, hopefully so.

I agree on Moore being underrated.  I don't think we have any idea on what his ceiling actually could be....given he has never really played with a QB who could really test that out.   Cam's arm was shot and Teddy wouldn't take the shots (then sprinkle in some really bad QBs mixed in for him). 

That was the pro with Jake.  Jake would at least allow you to see everything a WR had in them.   

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going to be Sunday afternoon again which sucks.
    • The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...