Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stanley Cup Playoffs: Round Two, Game 5, 6*, 7* - Win or Done.


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I’m not really even that worried about that as I am them littering the ice with “broken sticks” & holding our sticks as long as possible. I feel like Karma is gonna fix the cap issue.

Well as a Panthers fan too, we all know the Saints haven't had their karma come their way yet.....I am still waiting.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rocky Davis said:

Well as a Panthers fan too, we all know the Saints haven't had their karma come their way yet.....I am still waiting.

The lightning aren’t the saints. Trust me. They are gonna go the way of the blackhawks this next offseason. The NHL does not fug around with the salary cap because they have to abide by Canadian law too. This is a loophole that’s gonna be closed soon as this season is over. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

Well as a Panthers fan too, we all know the Saints haven't had their karma come their way yet.....I am still waiting.

They are gonna lose the highest value available player to the expansion draft and still not have enough money to keep 2 of their protected players. Even if those guys take a huge pay cut. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

They are gonna lose the highest value available player to the expansion draft and still not have even money to keep 2 of their protected players. 

That's not gonna make anybody feel better if they can catch all their tears in Lord Stanley's Cup!

We need to exact justice ourselves!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...