Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF says something nice about Sam Darnold


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Notice its from Glenwo2.

My reply^^^

You entering the conversation^^^^^^^^

^^^^^^^Me pointing out  that that 3.6% to 3.0% is a 16.7% reduction in joking fashion.

Seriously, not everything is a war dude. 

We know his stats aren't good.   You've made the point over and over and over.  

You don't have to wage war against every stat.

Fair point. That was actually that idiot's post in your post I was reading.

Try to calm down. I am just pointing out that stats need context, especially the dumb one he pointed out. For instance, Cam Newton's career low in INT's was actually the 2019 season. Something strike you as odd about that stat? How about the stat that his second lowest INT total in a season(technically a tie with 2015) was 2020. 

Guess he crushed it in 2019 and 2020, right? See how that works?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SBBlue said:

Citing Sams ints by year is not  "literally inventing something that isn't real"

You are literally using the word "literally" wrong.

Does it lack context?  Yes, but the stat is NOT invented and is LITERALLY real.

 

Kungfool then goes on to argue with YOU and then claim he didn't realize you were citing my post later on.

This guy is too much.  🤣

(oh and he has me on Ignore, he says?  Great.  Of course...for him to try to reply to what I pointed out earlier kind of defeats the whole "ignore" thing but to each his own.)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/7/2021 at 5:00 PM, SBBlue said:

I didn't post the ints  by year dude.  You're arguing  with @glenwo2  through me.

Sheesh.

 

It's funny cuz one of his favorite deals is telling people they need work on their reading comprehension. lol

 

21 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

Kungfool then goes on to argue with YOU and then claim he didn't realize you were citing my post later on.

This guy is too much.  🤣

(oh and he has me on Ignore, he says?  Great.  Of course...for him to try to reply to what I pointed out earlier kind of defeats the whole "ignore" thing but to each his own.)

 

He's playing 4D chess don't cha know?

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly this as well.  Beyond age concerns--by the time they find out if they have something in Penix, they'll need to work on a new contract not long after.  The newer league winning QBs have gotten extensions by year 3 (ie. Burrow).  So, if Penix somehow lights it up year 3, he could turn around fairly quickly, probably by year 4, and ask for an extension.  ATL has really no buffer time in easing the bucks off the QB room to build a team around him.  Not to mention, they'll be needing to make decisions on Terrell, London, Pitts, Bijan, a lot of high end investments BEFORE seeing Penix through, and that's IF he works out.   Lindstrom's contract is backloaded too and they can't cut Matthews until after 2026.   Just a terrible use of resources as it relates to timing & salary allocation, no matter how you look at it.   You're in win now, so get a talent to win now.  
    • it's  already going to be painful enough watching Caleb Williams throw TD passes to DJ Moore on a regular basis week in & week out   & naturally not sit there & reflect back & say to yourself woulda shoulda coulda especially if Bryce Young never looks remotely similar to a #1 pick   
    • Agreed.  I would expect most realistic fans to tamper their expectations.  There is a scenario where we simply over drafted him at 1, but he still has a solid career and can become a franchise QB.  That is what I am curious to find out.  Does he have what it takes to become the guy.  If he can somehow do any of the stuff you stated in year two then fantastic, but that's not where my head is at judging by his rookie play and the state of the franchise.  
×
×
  • Create New...