Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any ACC folks on here?


1usctrojan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Happy Panther said:

I need a translation. What does it mean?

Three conferences, BIG-10, PAC-12 and ACC are in negotiations to form an alliance….scheduling and strengthening a voting block to weaken the SEC.  SEC 16 schools vs the 3 Conferences 46 schools.

Everyone gets to keep their conferences in tact, but strengthen their collective voice.  This could also lead to an academic alliance, with every member, save Nebraska, in the BIG, 9 of the PAC12 and 4 in the ACC are members of AAC, an invitation only association of research universities.

Football millions is chump change vs billions of research dollars brings to a school and conference.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 1usctrojan said:

Three conferences, BIG-10, PAC-12 and ACC are in negotiations to form an alliance….scheduling and strengthening a voting block to weaken the SEC.  SEC 16 schools vs the 3 Conferences 46 schools.

Everyone gets to keep their conferences in tact, but strengthen their collective voice.  This could also lead to an academic alliance, with every member, save Nebraska, in the BIG, 9 of the PAC12 and 4 in the ACC are members of AAC, an invitation only association of research universities.

Football millions is chump change vs billions of research dollars brings to a school and conference.

 

Thank you.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, 1usctrojan said:

ESPN:

“The alliance between the ACC, Big Ten and Pac-12 will be announced at 2 p.m. ET Tuesday, sources told ESPN.

The three leagues are expected to emphasize "common values" and unanimous support impacting key topics affecting college athletes and schools in all sports. Sources say the Pac-12 has been the most aggressive of the three leagues forming and encouraging the alliance.

 
When news first broke of a potential alliance earlier this month, a Pac-12 source told ESPN that the league was a bit further along than the other two in building support and enthusiasm for the pact. Other sources in the league expected an announcement to come sooner.

Another source familiar with the discussions on Tuesday told ESPN, "The Pac-12 is driving this."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And I’m fine with that.   But, with an impatient owner….that carries high odds of just him employing a new HC in the not distant future.  The “we will see if the scheme that doesn’t fit our #1 overall pick QB works or not” approach seems like a rocky plan for all.  If I was Canales I would give it shot but demanded I need to be able to sign a legit backup QB in case what I was given just doesn’t work and can transition at the end of the year 
    • That's really unlikely to happen.  The reality is, they are building for what Canales wants to do.  That's what all coaches do.  And if Bryce can't do that, he's another peg that has to be replaced.
    • There is nothing unpopular at all about your opinion. How everything played out on the field backs it up. Bryce starts the season with much fanfare, gives the atl game away, and showed anyone who watched that his arm talent was shockingly bad. bad look, so after a few weeks, the team cooks up a fake injury that nobody saw, presumably to decide what direction to go next. Enter Dalton for one game while Bryce is seen walking comfortably on the sideline, smiling and yucking it up like he’s a 5 year vet.  Dalton performs admirably given the circumstances (please no Dalton ve Bryce retort). The contrast between the two was so strong that it’s still debated today. If Dalton’s performance was similar to what Bryce had done up to that point, I truly believe they would have sat Bryce longer, but it wasn’t.  Dalton relied on vet savvy and a better arm. It’s debatable how many games that gets us. Meaningless to fans, but not to players with serious financial incentives on the line.  What it really was, was a ‘young man (see what I did?)’ playing a grown man’s game, who lacked basic fundamentals and essential physical talent, behind a line that was VERY ill suited for the scheme forced on them, WRs who looked completely confused and unmotivated, with a back stabbing coaching staff in give up mode, GM who I wouldn’t trust to organize my cooking utensil drawer and an owner who meets with coaches every week and tells them which plays he likes and which ones he doesn’t.  Bryce doesn’t get a mulligan, but I’m willing to give him a ‘my bad’ from the team. Last season stunk worse than Bigfoot’s di**. It literally can’t get ANY worse than the unwatchable sh** show that was last year.  I have to see a monumental change in his physical ability and overall confidence. I have to see that he found a laser arm, somewhere, in the offseason, or everything else is irrelevant. 
×
×
  • Create New...