Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Streaming NFL Packages compared


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thought a reasonable recent summary would be helpful to some.   (Yes, I know this could have gone in the main forum 'cause it's football-related, but figured it'd be perfectly fine here too.  )

This is from https://variety.com/feature/watch-nfl-online-1235045647/ , "HOW TO WATCH AND STREAM THE NFL"

  • Amazon Prime:  11 Thursday Night games
  • YouTube TV: Basic plan comes basic broadcasters along with ESPN and NFL network. Sports package with Red Zone is extra
  • Hulu Plus: Fox, CBS, NBC, ESPN
  • Fubo TV: NBC, Fox, CBS, ESPN, NFL Network
  • ESPN Plus: uh.... ESPN
  • SlingTV:   Either ESPN or Fox+NBC, depending on package. Redzone is available for extra

 

[insert obligatory "just watch the streams for free from some random Reddit post/Google search" comment here]

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Thought a reasonable recent summary would be helpful to some.   (Yes, I know this could have gone in the main forum 'cause it's football-related, but figured it'd be perfectly fine here too.  )

This is from https://variety.com/feature/watch-nfl-online-1235045647/ , "HOW TO WATCH AND STREAM THE NFL"

  • Amazon Prime:  11 Thursday Night games
  • YouTube TV: Basic plan comes basic broadcasters along with ESPN and NFL network. Sports package with Red Zone is extra
  • Hulu Plus: Fox, CBS, NBC, ESPN
  • Fubo TV: NBC, Fox, CBS, ESPN, NFL Network
  • ESPN Plus: uh.... ESPN
  • SlingTV:   Either ESPN or Fox+NBC, depending on package. Redzone is available for extra

 

[insert obligatory "just watch the streams for free from some random Reddit post/Google search" comment here]

One small comment…not all of the streaming service have the same picture quality.  Hulu TV is good, so is Fubu…good.  The interfaces for both of those are decent.

Sling TV with no locals is really meh.  The streaming quality is VERY meh.

Youtube TV is best and I dont like how expensive it is so no bias at all.  Best interface and quality.  I can tape every NFL game played by NFL Network, ESPN and others with no worries.  Youtube TVs DVR is ridiculous.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Thought a reasonable recent summary would be helpful to some.   (Yes, I know this could have gone in the main forum 'cause it's football-related, but figured it'd be perfectly fine here too.  )

This is from https://variety.com/feature/watch-nfl-online-1235045647/ , "HOW TO WATCH AND STREAM THE NFL"

  • Amazon Prime:  11 Thursday Night games
  • YouTube TV: Basic plan comes basic broadcasters along with ESPN and NFL network. Sports package with Red Zone is extra
  • Hulu Plus: Fox, CBS, NBC, ESPN
  • Fubo TV: NBC, Fox, CBS, ESPN, NFL Network
  • ESPN Plus: uh.... ESPN
  • SlingTV:   Either ESPN or Fox+NBC, depending on package. Redzone is available for extra

 

[insert obligatory "just watch the streams for free from some random Reddit post/Google search" comment here]

Hulu Live also now has the NFL Network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oooooh, so close to having another reasonable option for watching NFL online.  Almost sounds like FOX's answer to NFL's RedZone, but something tells me that this may be FOX-specific rather than across all networks (ala RedZone or ESPN's NFL highlights show)

=-=-=-

FOX has announced that they will be expanding their (free) TUBI streaming channel to include sports, including NFL.

Tubi’s curated NFL channel will include “near-to-live” in-season digital highlights plus replays of “some of the most memorable matchups in NFL history” and library content including past seasons of the series “Hard Knocks.” 

the Tubi hub also will comprise nearly 700 hours of on-demand content at launch from the NFL, MLB, Nascar, Big Ten, Concacaf soccer, PBC boxing, PBA bowling and more.

 

https://variety.com/2021/digital/news/tubi-free-live-sports-channels-fox-nfl-mlb-1235048068/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

New update, for those of you on Verizon cellphones who were able to stream the NFL for free:

=-=-

Verizon had carried NFL games live on mobile in the U.S. since 2010, and under its pact with the league in 2017 had relinquished exclusive mobile streaming rights. Now it’s ending that piece of the NFL deal. 

https://variety.com/2021/biz/news/verizon-nfl-marketing-tech-partnership-10-year-1235059764/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...