Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Starting RG on covid list


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

Its not on the county. Dont blame the county. You are a Mod. The buck stops with you. I think you made fun of me when I made a comment about using alts. This is the kind of bullshit you should say with your alt account...not your main and MOD account. 

But here we go. See attached file for baseless claim said MODERATOR posted. 

Now the evidence. 

Doses Administered in Buncombe County according to a source out wonderful mod would not cite. 97,300+ 

Source: https://www.buncombecounty.org/Governing/Depts/Health/News_Detail.aspx?id=19057

Population of Buncombe Country according to latest US census: 261,191. 

Source: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/buncombecountynorthcarolina


But you are so wrong bro. Really, mods should not engage and be wrong on their main, 

If you do the math, the percentage is 37.27 . A FAR cry from the uncited stay of 61% touted by a Mod. 

 

KakaoTalk_20210907_234351360.jpg

Contact Buncombe County and ask them about the discrepancy.

What point are you trying to make?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but did notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

I didn't even bother to click on the link. LOL! That's fuging hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

I gave facts here. I cited real sources this moderator did not bother to cite before making baseless claims. We were told that was a perma ban offense. I know yall wont. He is one of yall. But exposed today

Real facts got dropped on you by @mav1234

You're wrong and by your own logic you're arguing that you should be permabanned.

Someone got exposed alright...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I didn't even bother to click on the link. LOL! That's fuging hilarious.

Not to mention those are doses administered by BCHHS specifically it seemsI...  don't know the counties vaccine distribution effort but it probably doesn't include stats when people get one or both doses elsewhere. Not to mention we don't know the percentage of those doses that were J&J...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but didn't notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

Not only that but he used census data on total population, which isn't what ANY of the vaccinated rates are based on. They are based on "eligible recipients". It doesn't take a genius to realize that that number is significantly less than total census population. 

Edited by Floppin
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

I gave facts here. I cited real sources this moderator did not bother to cite before making baseless claims. We were told that was a perma ban offense. I know yall wont. He is one of yall. But exposed today

Better to have kept your mouth shut and been assumed a moron than to have opened it and removed all doubt. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Floppin said:

Not only that buy he used census data on total population, which isn't what ANY of the vaccinated rates are based on. They are based on "eligible recipients". It doesn't take a genius to realize that that number is significantly less than total census population. 

Good point. Another reason we shouldn't extrapolate doses administered to % or rate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but didn't notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

Hahaha dude you took a small time slice of vaccination effort for one entity doing vaccinations out of many, did shitty napkin math that was wrong on multiple levels, and embarassed yourself. Do keep up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

You still haven't figured out that the "doses administered" figure that you're using is only for a 2.5 week period and not a "total doses administered"?

My god dude, just stop before you embarrass yourself more.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Also, BCHHS is a department so this may not even include CVS, Walgreens, etc. According to the NC dashboard, the total number of first doses in the county is 166k and if you include second doses, the total number of doses for the county is probably almost triple the number. Man, some people are just morons.

0C092FC0-FC86-4297-A768-0327CCE64CBA.png

Yup, and as @Floppin Pointed out we can't use census numbers since rates are usually reported as elligible adults.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
    • I hate Marchand, but if he became a free agent.....
×
×
  • Create New...