Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Malcolm Roach


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why wasn't this guy thrown out of the game on the helmet to helmet on CMC.  That was as blatant of a head to head hit I've seen all season.

It clearly looked like to me that he was intentionally trying to hurt CMC.  Knowing the Saint history I would not have been surprised if they were told to take a shot if available.

We got the unsportsmanlike conduct but he should have been ejected. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My reaction at the time honestly seemed like it was fine. I’d want my DT showing that much urgency towards the ball carrier. I understand the penalty but helmets are going to make contact sometimes. I can’t see how a huge DT can dive towards a player and not have his head down. 
 

The NFL is in a very odd place right now lol. It’s really hard to codify rules of safety into something so chaotic and violent. 

The 2nd call on Darnold was pretty loose too. 
 

I’m not complaining because we’ll get our fair share of bad calls too in the end, but I’m not holding ill will towards Roach. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

My reaction at the time honestly seemed like it was fine. I’d want my DT showing that much urgency towards the ball carrier. I understand the penalty but helmets are going to make contact sometimes. I can’t see how a huge DT can dive towards a player and not have his head down. 
 

The NFL is in a very odd place right now lol. It’s really hard to codify rules of safety into something so chaotic and violent. 

The 2nd call on Darnold was pretty loose too. 
 

I’m not complaining because we’ll get our fair share of bad calls too in the end, but I’m not holding ill will towards Roach. 

1:21 seconds of this video

He clearly launches himself at CMC and IMO was blatant about it. 

 

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

My reaction at the time honestly seemed like it was fine. I’d want my DT showing that much urgency towards the ball carrier. I understand the penalty but helmets are going to make contact sometimes. I can’t see how a huge DT can dive towards a player and not have his head down. 
 

The NFL is in a very odd place right now lol. It’s really hard to codify rules of safety into something so chaotic and violent. 

The 2nd call on Darnold was pretty loose too. 
 

I’m not complaining because we’ll get our fair share of bad calls too in the end, but I’m not holding ill will towards Roach. 

Overall, this is how I feel about it as well.

When looking at the league as a whole.

The Saints, with their specific history as an organization, get no such benefit of the doubt, nor should they. He should have been ejected. That is still Sean Payton on the sideline, the same HC as when the team got busted for hunting heads, and Payton has never demonstrated that he's got an ounce of humility or regret over it.

Nah. @#$% that. The Saints get zero benefit of the doubt on headhunting calls til Payton is no longer running the place. Actions have consequences. I would be perfectly fine if the league sent a message by not giving that organization any benefit of the doubt on such calls until EVERYONE associated with it was no longer a part of the team. This is how reputation works. You made your bed, now lay in it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Overall, this is how I feel about it as well.

When looking at the league as a whole.

The Saints, with their specific history as an organization, get no such benefit of the doubt, nor should they. He should have been ejected. That is still Sean Payton on the sideline, the same HC as when the team got busted for hunting heads, and Payton has never demonstrated that he's got an ounce of humility or regret over it.

Nah. @#$% that. The Saints get zero benefit of the doubt on headhunting calls til Payton is no longer running the place. Actions have consequences. I would be perfectly fine if the league sent a message by not giving that organization any benefit of the doubt on such calls until EVERYONE associated with it was no longer a part of the team. This is how reputation works. You made your bed, now lay in it.

Totally agree.  Peyton sat out a year but I don't believe for one second he regretted it.  Though he may not have a bounty on someone's head he clearly doesn't discourage trying to take someone out. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...