Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What did they see in Darnold?


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Trubisky? Rosen? Bortles? Gabbert? Locker? EJ?  Ponder? 

I mean what we attempted with Sam is unique.   No one is snatching up the really bad busted QBs and rolling with them right away. 

Seems like the path Young and them took still is in play.  Got to earn your way back to a chance.  

making Sam the dude seems like a pretty self inflicted mistake that a front office shouldn’t make IMO.  Got no issue with bringing a someone like him in to an org.  But you have to actually see if you can fix them first.   

All those situation had a legit starter or at least a starting option right?? Did we have that?? 

Context..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Favre and Young are outliers, I can name 5 other QBs for every Favre or Young.

 

I was right when I compared him to Josh Rosen. They just suck no matter the circumstances, no sugarcoating it.

The point was that it has happened.. I can come up with outlier for anything...

Tannahill, Brees , Warner with the Giants, Delhome with the saints.. 

Alot QB have gotten different scenery and produced at a new team...

The point of acting like it a unheard of plan is false..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

All those situation had a legit starter or at least a starting option right?? Did we have that?? 

Context..

Huh?  

no team snatched any of them up after they busted hard with the team that drafted them….and then attempted to make them the man immediately after.  You said the second chances now happen quicker….unlike in the era of all the other guys that also weren’t comps. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Huh?  

no team snatched any of them up after they busted hard with the team that drafted them….and then attempted to make them the man immediately after.  You said the second chances now happen quicker….unlike in the era of all the other guys that also weren’t comps. 

 

Brees it has happened..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

The point was that it has happened.. I can come up with outlier for anything...

Tannahill, Brees , Warner with the Giants, Delhome with the saints.. 

Alot QB have gotten different scenery and produced at a new team...

none of those guys stunk the league up for 3 straight years…and were then picked up to be the man right away somewhere else though. 
 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

none of those guys stunk the league up for 3 straight years…and were then picked up to be the man right away somewhere else though. 
 

How many criteria  are you going to come up with to make a point .

Does it have to be on every 3rd sunday in August on a leap year for it to be similar situation??

When you have to go as deep as well this guy didn't start right away or he had to do it for 3 years and it had to happen every 4th sunday in a month..

Your point isn't made..

Again agree to disagree..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

You can believe what you want.. 

Facts are it has happened before it wasn't a outbound plan and so far it hasn't worked for us.  

Whelp Hopefully it works next time we try to resurrect a player.. Like many other teams have done in the past..

I choose to believe the Saints acquiring Brees isn’t similar to us making Sam the man.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I choose to believe the Saints acquiring Brees isn’t similar to us making Sam the man.   

Cool .. I choose to believe getting a player coming off a major injury to his throwing arm was a risk just as much as finding out if a once thought of top 5 talented pick could be developed with better coaching in a different situation.. Both are similar risk..

You can have your opinion and I can have mine...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to have to disagree with the whole "we need to fix the offensive line before we go after a franchise QB excuse "......cause a good competent QB with mobility can make an awful Oline look somewhat decent.  Just look at the titans and ravens who are both 5-2 with 3 less allowed sacks than the panthers. Both teams have been playing pretty well especially Baltimore considering all the injuries on defense.  Both teams possess a confident QB who can extend plays. Yes a good offensive line is important especially if you want to control the clock but I'm just saying if you have a QB like Watson who I think is better than Lamar and tannehill could definitely improve our offensive line so to speak 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...