Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 10: Canes @ Panthers (11/6)

MillionDollarCam

By MillionDollarCam,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

I disagree on that. We have one of the best power plays in the league. We just only get 1-3 chances a game usually. Most teams going against us get half a dozen. Missing pesce showed cause they put Bear in his spot and Bear doesn’t quite have the finesse yet. 
 

Though I don’t like our PP lineups right now. I’d rather throw Bear into the fire on 1 and have TDA QB the 2. No need to over tax Slavin. 

No net front presence and the passing is too slow.

Florida scored two power play goals because they had a net front presence on one and moved the puck really quickly to spread out the defense on the other.

RBA’s power play is so predictable… it’s the bumper play or have TDA feed it to the sides for a one-timer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Here’s the reason that’s a major.

TDA literally warns Lomberg that he’s going to run Raanta by tapping him on the arm. Lomberg ignores, doesn’t pick his head up, and makes contact with the head.

This type of play happens once a week and usually results in the players having the wherewithal to realize the goalie is out.

Lomberg reaches out for the puck half heartedly knowing that there was going to be a collision. That poo was intentional.

 

l

Ya it’s clear from that angle he didn’t pull up at all until literally the last second. Do I think there was anything malicious there? Maybe. Florida has been playing like dicks all game. Do I think that would have been a five if this game was 0-0 or close at that point? Nope. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • countryboi
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By countryboi · Posted

      You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • Icege
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By Icege · Posted

      I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Navy_football
      Clowney released

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...