Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 10: Canes @ Panthers (11/6)


MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

I disagree on that. We have one of the best power plays in the league. We just only get 1-3 chances a game usually. Most teams going against us get half a dozen. Missing pesce showed cause they put Bear in his spot and Bear doesn’t quite have the finesse yet. 
 

Though I don’t like our PP lineups right now. I’d rather throw Bear into the fire on 1 and have TDA QB the 2. No need to over tax Slavin. 

No net front presence and the passing is too slow.

Florida scored two power play goals because they had a net front presence on one and moved the puck really quickly to spread out the defense on the other.

RBA’s power play is so predictable… it’s the bumper play or have TDA feed it to the sides for a one-timer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Here’s the reason that’s a major.

TDA literally warns Lomberg that he’s going to run Raanta by tapping him on the arm. Lomberg ignores, doesn’t pick his head up, and makes contact with the head.

This type of play happens once a week and usually results in the players having the wherewithal to realize the goalie is out.

Lomberg reaches out for the puck half heartedly knowing that there was going to be a collision. That poo was intentional.

 

l

Ya it’s clear from that angle he didn’t pull up at all until literally the last second. Do I think there was anything malicious there? Maybe. Florida has been playing like dicks all game. Do I think that would have been a five if this game was 0-0 or close at that point? Nope. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...