Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It all comes back to Peppers


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

I nominate this the dumbest thread ever on any message board. You got a coach that can't motivate a funkin dog to bark. You got a QB that is very, very consistent at being inconsistent. And you want to blame it all on a great player because he gets tired of the bull sh!t, Like many of their fans.

Dumbest thread ever,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken Lucas

G. Hangartner

Frank Omaley (sp?)

Maybe these guys were not 'great players', but 2 were 'great backups' and Lucas was a good CB. I don't think Marshall has proven to be better than Lucas....he is a better nickel.

With the way the bills Oline is looking Hangman could be coming back next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we should have let Pep walk although it would have set a really bad precedent with Jenkins walking the year before. To say that there were a bunch of stud FA out there that we could have gotten if we didn't re-sign him is ludicrous though.

The best we could have went after was Cutler and he was not a FA so we would have had to give up a poo ton for him like Chicago did. All that not taging Pep would have done would be to give us the money to absorb his contract.

I don't agree with simply letting him walk. IF the money could have been used to upgrade starting positions, I would be more for it. That kind of quality did not exist in free agency this year. Since we were going to spend the money anyway, why not hang onto Peppers and see if a deal can be made next year? If we had tied up that cap room by signing backups, there would have been a whole other round whining. That's alot of money tied up on players that you hope to never use.

Cutler was never a viable option. Without a 1st round pick this year (Otah) we couldn't come close to matching the Chicago offer if we had wanted to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly why I have such a distaste for Peppers now. He essentialy crippled us by refusing to sign his tender this offseason. I am still trying to figure out how he is a captain after the way this offseason played out and how he pretty much quit on our team after the arizona game last season. I mean does our team even vote like everyone else. Or does Foxy just pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly why I have such a distaste for Peppers now. He essentialy crippled us by refusing to sign his tender this offseason. I am still trying to figure out how he is a captain after the way this offseason played out and how he pretty much quit on our team after the arizona game last season. I mean does our team even vote like everyone else. Or does Foxy just pick?

Yes they vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys act like this is madden. Just because you have cap space doesnt mean you can just get whatever guys you want. you still have to outbid other teams who had way more cap space than us, then you also have to convince other fa's to come here.

you guys always say who we could have had with that money. but who? the fa market was way overrated $100 mil for albert haynesworth!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So all the cap space had nothing to do with Special teams?

Not really.

Pep was not being paid $18M for the past 3-4 seasons and our special teams SUCKED. The reason is Crossman....plain and simple.

Danny Crossman took over one of the best ST units in the league. Int the matter of a few seasons, he has turned them into a laughing stock. The blame is his and his alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now, XL is probably outside the top 100 NFL WR's. That is just not going to cut it.  He certainly could turn it around but our track record in this area is very well established. When our WR's bust, boy do they bust. XL looks exactly like so many of those cases.  XL has been the 9th most productive WR in that 2024 class and is likely to slip to 10th very soon as one of the guys who missed a large chunk of last season is about to pass him(Pearsall) in career production. That's not great for the 7th overall WR picked. It's a disappointment, without question. Even a the guy getting healthy scratches has still outperformed him so far.  And, for the record, it was a very, very productive WR class so far.
    • 4th read? On a playaction? Do you not watch the ALL 22? There were 4 receivers on that play. Only 2 went beyond 2 yards on a 10 yard crossing route in front of a single high safety. The TE stayed in to block before releasing on a drag route and was never a read. Coker was motioned to the right to pull a defender to the sideline. This was a clear flat route and hot if the defender came on a blitz. The RB stayed in to block on the right side. Coming out of the playaction Bryce spots the defender for a possible blitz and then goes to his primary receiver on his left. The only receiver on the left coming out of the playaction was TMac. He clearly follows TMac to the cross in front of the safety and looks off the safety to the left. This is not a read to XL. It's looking off the safety. He swings his vision back to his primary in TMac and throws the ball to the numbers (20) 10 yards over the head of the DB when TMac reaches the right hashes near the 30 yard line before TMac even makes a cut. Bryce was never leading or throwing to the receiver. He was throwing to a spot based on the movement of 2 defenders. It was up to TMac to make this play happen with perfect timing, release, sell and cut on his route. Give credit to the play design. The defense is playing that route as a sideline route and TMac makes it happen with his body position and control as he cuts/drifts 10 yards up field to the spot he knew it was going to before the play. If that were a 4th progression read out of a playaction, you'd see 4 hitch steps and the receiver would have been led to the sideline as TMac would have never known the ball was going to be thrown 10 yards over the DBs head on a 10 yard cross to the sideline. You can also tell this is the desgin as Bryce sets to the left out of the playaction with XL on his right before the cross. Then he takes 3 bounce steps to move with the pocket as XL is late to the cross. His first hitch step is to the right after TMac crosses, which is followed by an immediate throw before a cut is made by TMac. TMac was the only receiver to the left on Bryce's set, and he was one of 2 WRs to the right on Bryce's first and only hitch step. Give TMac and the play design a bulk of the credit. Bryce did well, but he didn't sell the playaction or a possible pass to XL very well. He did do very well at throwing to a predetermined spot on the field after TMac set up that crossing route perfectly with XL and Sanders both late on developing their routes. Did you catch all that on the play? For some reason, you think there were 4 progressions out of play action with the defense pressing, Bryce setting his hips to the left with all 3 receivers on the right side of what you think was his 4th option as the only receiver on the left at the snap, and only 1 hitch step to the right after TMac waits for XL to cross left. Why would you think a QB would set their hips to the left when their first 3 progressions are on the right side of the field?
    • Agreed, however there are many QBs that don't place it perfectly.  
×
×
  • Create New...